On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:44:25 -0000, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:

>And lo on Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:19:56 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>  
>did spake, saying:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:05:06 -0000, "Phil Cook"
>> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>
>>> Oooh I see me not making any friends with this post oooh!
>>
>> Wrong Mate
>
>Oooh I see Stephen mentioning something Scottish in a reply to someone  
>oooh.

Bar Steward! Och! I wus wrang Pal/Jimmie. Ye'r no ma best mate ony mare.  :) 


>Oooh I see a cheap TV network offering me a show working with Yvette  
>Fielding oooh.

Have you been smoking old chap? Your references leave me in the dark.

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

> 
> Bar Steward! Och! I wus wrang Pal/Jimmie. Ye'r no ma best mate ony mare.
>  :)
I've sooo heard groundkeeper Willie speaking in my head...

Post a reply to this message

On 17 Jan 2008 08:48:03 -0500, Michael Zier <mic### [at] mirizide> wrote:

>> 
>> Bar Steward! Och! I wus wrang Pal/Jimmie. Ye'r no ma best mate ony mare.
>>  :)
>I've sooo heard groundkeeper Willie speaking in my head...

See yous can yer mither sew, ya bampot.

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

And lo on Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:10:47 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>  
did spake, saying:

> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:44:25 -0000, "Phil Cook"
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
>> And lo on Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:19:56 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>
>> did spake, saying:
>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:05:06 -0000, "Phil Cook"
>>> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oooh I see me not making any friends with this post oooh!
>>>
>>> Wrong Mate
>>
>> Oooh I see Stephen mentioning something Scottish in a reply to someone
>> oooh.
>
> Bar Steward! Och! I wus wrang Pal/Jimmie. Ye'r no ma best mate ony  
> mare.  :)

Something about a horse in a pub?

>> Oooh I see a cheap TV network offering me a show working with Yvette
>> Fielding oooh.
>
> Have you been smoking old chap? Your references leave me in the dark.

Knowing you'd ask I had the link to hand  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_Haunted :-P

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:55:41 -0000, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:

>>
>> Bar Steward! Och! I wus wrang Pal/Jimmie. Ye'r no ma best mate ony  
>> mare.  :)
>
>Something about a horse in a pub?

It could be:)

>>> Oooh I see a cheap TV network offering me a show working with Yvette
>>> Fielding oooh.
>>
>> Have you been smoking old chap? Your references leave me in the dark.
>
>Knowing you'd ask I had the link to hand  
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_Haunted :-P

It is time I got a new set of yarrow sticks.

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

And lo on Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:46:03 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did  
spake, saying:

> scott wrote:
>>> It's kinda frustrating that everything has to be at such a low  
>>> resolution to go onto a DVD. But then, when you watch it on TV... well  
>>> let me put it this way. I put a test render on there at half  
>>> resolution once. It looked horrid on my computer screen.
>>  Even if you sat the same distance from your computer screen as you did  
>> from the TV?
>
> ESPECIALLY if you sat at the same distance!!
>
> But then, people usually don't, and presumably the TV screen is designed  
> with this in mind. (For example, the three phosphore bands are clearly  
> visible to the naked eye on a TV screen. On a computer monitor, you'd  
> need a lense of some kind to see them...)

I can see them with my naked eye, I can't with my glasses on mind. I do  
have to close one eye and squint a bit though.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

Phil Cook wrote:
> Except WMM insists on outputting everything as wmv (or wma) at 25fps 
> regardless of input

I think I just used it to suck the DV off the camera. Maybe if you 
actually edit it refuses to write it back out in anything other than 
Windows formats. Yah, that sounds likely. :-)

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     It's not feature creep if you put it
     at the end and adjust the release date.

Post a reply to this message

Invisible wrote:
> Well, there are physics simulations of various kinds for POV-Ray too. 

Has anyone noticed that off-topic seems exceptionally off-topic lately, 
even for off-topic?

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     It's not feature creep if you put it
     at the end and adjust the release date.

Post a reply to this message

In article <op.t42htmvic3xi7v@news.povray.org>, 
phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk says...
> And lo on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:37:28 -0000, Fredrik Eriksson  
> <noo### [at] nowherecom> did spake, saying:
> 
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:25:23 +0100, Patrick Elliott <sel### [at] rraznet> 
 
> > wrote:
> >> Hmm. In line with this, just wondering if there is some way to feed
> >> something through it to fix a problem I have? My father, being a major
> >> dope about video cameras, treated it like a picture camera and recorde
d
> >> sections of videos sideways... I know in theory that you could pull th
e
> >> audio out, strip the stream down to individual frames, rotate those to
 a
> >> normal orientation, then restream it all, but I wasn't sure if there w
as
> >> any way to use VirtualDub or one of the other free tools that exist to
> >> manage that.
> >
> >
> > I recall there being a 'rotate' filter in VirtualDub.
> 
> Worship me for I can see the future :-P
> 
> http://flipc.blogspot.com/2006/11/rotating-videos-virtual-dub-way.html
> 
Awesome! Now I just have to get around to downloading VirtualDub again, 
installing it on my dad's computer and then using it. lol

-- 
void main () {

    if version = "Vista" {
      call slow_by_half();
      call DRM_everything();
    }
    call functional_code();
  }
  else
    call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message

And lo on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:11:33 -0000, Patrick Elliott  
<sel### [at] rraznet> did spake, saying:

> In article <op.t42htmvic3xi7v@news.povray.org>,
> phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk says...
>> And lo on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:37:28 -0000, Fredrik Eriksson
>> <noo### [at] nowherecom> did spake, saying:
>>
>> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:25:23 +0100, Patrick Elliott <sel### [at] rraznet>
>> > wrote:
>> >> I wasn't sure if there was
>> >> any way to use VirtualDub or one of the other free tools that exist  
>> >> to manage that.
>> >
>> >
>> > I recall there being a 'rotate' filter in VirtualDub.
>>
>> Worship me for I can see the future :-P
>>
>> http://flipc.blogspot.com/2006/11/rotating-videos-virtual-dub-way.html
>>
> Awesome! Now I just have to get around to downloading VirtualDub again,
> installing it on my dad's computer and then using it. lol

Hope it works for you.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message