 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:49:24 -0000, Sherry Shaw <ten### [at] aol com>
did spake, saying:
> Happy Freaking Birthday to me.
<sings> Why was she born so freaking beautiful,
Why was she freaking born at all,
She's no freaking use to anyone,
She's no freaking use at all.
Happy freaking birthday, break out the freaking sherry Sherry.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Happy (Belated) Birthday!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran wrote:
> You could consider adopting Andrew next year. You'll need to have him
> neutered of course, and pay the import tax, but as far as pets go he should
> be perfect.
>
> G.
Neutered? 8| (does that translate well as that bug-eyed shock face I've
seen on some forums?)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tom Austin
Subject: Re: Happy Freaking Birthday To Me, Dammit
Date: 15 Jan 2008 08:58:37
Message: <478cbc0d@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sherry Shaw wrote:
> So today is the third freaking birthday in a row without so much as a
> freaking birthday freaking card in the freaking mail. Happy Freaking
> Birthday to me.
>
> OK, I'm not especially upset. There are freaking people who have real
> freaking problems. (And, sure, I may be one of them, but freaking
> birthdays are pretty freaking low on the freaking list.)
>
> And, actually, it's not entirely true. I actually got three
> e-cards--one from my sister, one from my freaking Allstate agent, and
> one from freaking Mensa. And two of the freaking three can kiss my
> freaking butt.
>
> Ya know, I was just reading the freaking POV general board, and there's
> this freaking person who keeps posting these freaking messages, like,
> "Oh, I don't know very much about POV, but I can't do this stuff,
> because I don't know very much about math either" and I keep having this
> overwhelming desire to respond with something like, "Read the freaking
> manual," or "Read a freaking math book" or maybe even "Turn your
> freaking hat around, pull up your freaking pants, and get a freaking
> job." Now, that's not my usual freaking reaction to freaking newbies.
> My usual freaking reaction to freaking newbies is more like, "Oh, hello,
> I'm the evangelist of POV--bless you, my child--try this." And even if
> it's freaking irrelevant, or even freaking wrong, I don't have this
> freaking desire to slap the freaking crap out of the freaking newbie,
> and then freaking slap him for freaking crapping.
>
> I have this horrible fear that I've become a bitter old woman. And,
> just possibly, a crazy cat lady. Should I seek counseling?
>
> All help appreciated!
>
> --Sherry "Just Wondering" Shaw
>
>
You are a freak!
HFP
In a nice polite way ;-)
Tom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Austin wrote:
> Sherry Shaw wrote:
>> So today is the third freaking birthday in a row without so much as a
>> freaking birthday freaking card in the freaking mail. Happy Freaking
>> Birthday to me.
>>
>> OK, I'm not especially upset. There are freaking people who have real
>> freaking problems. (And, sure, I may be one of them, but freaking
>> birthdays are pretty freaking low on the freaking list.)
>>
>> And, actually, it's not entirely true. I actually got three
>> e-cards--one from my sister, one from my freaking Allstate agent, and
>> one from freaking Mensa. And two of the freaking three can kiss my
>> freaking butt.
>>
>> Ya know, I was just reading the freaking POV general board, and
>> there's this freaking person who keeps posting these freaking
>> messages, like, "Oh, I don't know very much about POV, but I can't do
>> this stuff, because I don't know very much about math either" and I
>> keep having this overwhelming desire to respond with something like,
>> "Read the freaking manual," or "Read a freaking math book" or maybe
>> even "Turn your freaking hat around, pull up your freaking pants, and
>> get a freaking job." Now, that's not my usual freaking reaction to
>> freaking newbies. My usual freaking reaction to freaking newbies is
>> more like, "Oh, hello, I'm the evangelist of POV--bless you, my
>> child--try this." And even if it's freaking irrelevant, or even
>> freaking wrong, I don't have this freaking desire to slap the freaking
>> crap out of the freaking newbie, and then freaking slap him for
>> freaking crapping.
>>
>> I have this horrible fear that I've become a bitter old woman. And,
>> just possibly, a crazy cat lady. Should I seek counseling?
>>
>> All help appreciated!
>>
>> --Sherry "Just Wondering" Shaw
>>
>>
>
>
> You are a freak!
>
> HFP
>
>
>
> In a nice polite way ;-)
>
> Tom
I can't type today
HFB
Tom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:11:53 -0600, Sherry Shaw wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:03:39 -0600, Sherry Shaw wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> Hey, happy (freaking!) birthday! ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>> (Freaking) thanks!!!
>>>
>>> --Sherry Shaw
>>
>> You're freakin' welcome! ;-)
>>
>> Jim
>
> Don't freakin' mention it!
>
> Seriously, you guys have freakin' improved my freakin' birthday
> tremendously! Thanks and thanks again!
>
> --Sherry Freakin' Shaw
<G>
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Chambers" <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote in message
news:478c58d0$1@news.povray.org...
> BTW, are you two related?
Not that I know of. Shaw is a very common surname in the UK (which is where
my family comes from)
There's one major branch that's english and 2 scottish (I think)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:20:39 +0200, "Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot
com> wrote:
>Shaw is a very common surname in the UK
Shaw's are never common.
Hold your head High :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote in message
news:ksnpo3dfhall22r4nkhdaq9j68bdq8f2u1@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:20:39 +0200, "Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa
dot
> com> wrote:
>
> >Shaw is a very common surname in the UK
>
> Shaw's are never common.
> Hold your head High :)
Perhaps I should have said widespread? Popular? Numerous?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:00:43 +0200, "Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot
com> wrote:
>Perhaps I should have said widespread? Popular? Numerous?
Perhaps, or just point out that I can't read :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
