 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> rebooting from scratch, and crossing their fingers in the hopes
> everything comes back on.
FWIW, it's known that this simply would not work for the phone system,
at least as implemented in the USA. A new phone switch coming up looks
to its peers for configuration, and there's no way to put configuration
into it otherwise at this point.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
It's not feature creep if you put it
at the end and adjust the release date.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Phil Cook wrote:
>> rebooting from scratch, and crossing their fingers in the hopes
>> everything comes back on.
>
> FWIW, it's known that this simply would not work for the phone system,
> at least as implemented in the USA. A new phone switch coming up looks
> to its peers for configuration, and there's no way to put configuration
> into it otherwise at this point.
>
Wow. So what would happen on a power outage along with total failure of
their backups? (not data backups; I mean UPSs and stuff)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Wow. So what would happen on a power outage along with total failure of
> their backups? (not data backups; I mean UPSs and stuff)
What, of the entire country? For several weeks? I think you'd have more
problems than rebooting the phones when you came back.
(Some phone systems have UPSes literally the size of small buildings.)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
It's not feature creep if you put it
at the end and adjust the release date.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> I LIVE!!
>
> Um... maybe "live" is putting it a little strongly...
>
You occupy space, and consume oxygen?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
