 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> All you need is server-side scripting. Count the parentheses levels and
> generate the CSS with that many levels. But a pure CSS method would be
> nice.
Nah; just generate a file with 20 levels of nesting. If there's more
than that, you won't be able to disentangle it visually anyway. (And
it's not like the program will crash; it'll just show less clean output.)
> Still, you should really use MathML. That's what it's made for...
What, drawing pretty lines around bits of text?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:08:59 -0000, Nicolas Alvarez
<nic### [at] gmail isthebestcom> did spake, saying:
>> Phil Cook wrote:
>>> And lo on Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:40:17 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull>
>>> did spake, saying:
>>>
>>>> Certainly a lot easier to find subexpressions than in the raw text
>>>> above. Just a pitty it takes so many miles of CSS...
>>>
>>> Well the CSS is fixed so just dump it into a separate file and all
>>> you'll have is the spans
>> True.
>> I'm wondering if I could do something weird with inheritance and
>> percentage units...
>
> All you need is server-side scripting. Count the parentheses levels and
> generate the CSS with that many levels.
Which was my first suggestion :-)
> But a pure CSS method would be nice.
>
> Still, you should really use MathML. That's what it's made for...
But little use unless you can serve it as application/xhtm+xml whereas
html is always served as text/html without the need for a dedicated server
component.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> span span span span {padding:14px; border: green 1px solid;}
Wonderful span! Glorious span! (span span span!)
Shut up! Shut up!
Could I have S(S(KS)K)(S(S(KS)K)I) without so much span in it?
EWWWW!
> span span span span span {padding:12px; border: blue 1px solid;}
> span span span span span span {padding:10px; border: red 1px dotted;}
Seriously, I didn't know you could do that with CSS. Cool.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Remember the good old days, when we
used to complain about cryptography
being export-restricted?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Sun, 11 Nov 2007 22:46:33 -0000, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
did spake, saying:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>> span span span span {padding:14px; border: green 1px solid;}
>
> Wonderful span! Glorious span! (span span span!)
>
> Shut up! Shut up!
>
> Could I have S(S(KS)K)(S(S(KS)K)I) without so much span in it?
>
> EWWWW!
well you could replace all the span with inline div :-)
>> span span span span span {padding:12px; border: blue 1px solid;}
>> span span span span span span {padding:10px; border: red 1px dotted;}
>
> Seriously, I didn't know you could do that with CSS. Cool.
Heh I think it should be called MySpace code
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> Heh I think it should be called MySpace code
That's not even funny. Seriously. Have you *seen* MySpace? >_<
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:33:17 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake, saying:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>
>> Heh I think it should be called MySpace code
>
> That's not even funny. Seriously. Have you *seen* MySpace? >_<
Oh yeah. I wasn't suggesting the term as a compliment.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Heh I think it should be called MySpace code
>>
>> That's not even funny. Seriously. Have you *seen* MySpace? >_<
>
> Oh yeah. I wasn't suggesting the term as a compliment.
The only thing worse than the HTML on MySpace is the crud the actual
users add to it themselves.
(I especially liked the red writing on a pink background with a hail of
red hearts constantly raining down in the foreground...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:05:36 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake, saying:
>>>> Heh I think it should be called MySpace code
>>>
>>> That's not even funny. Seriously. Have you *seen* MySpace? >_<
>> Oh yeah. I wasn't suggesting the term as a compliment.
>
> The only thing worse than the HTML on MySpace is the crud the actual
> users add to it themselves.
>
> (I especially liked the red writing on a pink background with a hail of
> red hearts constantly raining down in the foreground...)
I like the way MySapce<sic> don't enforce picture sizes then auto-expand
column widths.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Also... is there a reason why every MySpace profile randomly plays 6
different MP3 files at you simultaneously as soon as you visit it?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:25:53 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake, saying:
> Also... is there a reason why every MySpace profile randomly plays 6
> different MP3 files at you simultaneously as soon as you visit it?
Yes, but the reason is only revealed once you've been illuminated into the
9th degree.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
