 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi guys. I'm back.
For a while I've been hanging around the Haskell mailing list. But I've
just been flamed yet again (and not by the same person either), so
clearly I'm just not wanted there. :-(
But hey, you guys still love me, right?
Right???
0_0
Guys??
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
471260c1$1@news.povray.org...
>
> But hey, you guys still love me, right?
Un Anglais? je me demande....
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 schrieb:
> Hi guys. I'm back.
>
> For a while I've been hanging around the Haskell mailing list. But I've
> just been flamed yet again (and not by the same person either), so
> clearly I'm just not wanted there. :-(
>
> But hey, you guys still love me, right?
>
Who ...
Just kiddin ...
POV ist better than haskell ...
We are POV resistence ... is futile :-)
Have fun. Have POV.
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Schimmler wrote:
> POV ist better than haskell ...
...isn't that like saying that Calcium Hydroxide is better than
non-uniform rational beta-splines? (I.e., there is no suitable fitness
metric applicable to both items.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc Schimmler" <mar### [at] web de> wrote in message
news:4712725d@news.povray.org...
> We are POV resistence ... is futile :-)
> Have fun. Have POV.
Damn right! It is just *THE BEST*! :o)
~Steve~
>
> Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 14.10.2007 21:55, Orchid XP v7 nous fit lire :
> Marc Schimmler wrote:
>
>> POV ist better than haskell ...
>
> ...isn't that like saying that Calcium Hydroxide is better than
> non-uniform rational beta-splines? (I.e., there is no suitable fitness
> metric applicable to both items.)
But... I like NURBS!
and a substitute for caustic soda is always a good thing to consider
safely...
POV is the Best, no discussion.
--
The superior man understands what is right;
the inferior man understands what will sell.
-- Confucius
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le Forgeron wrote:
> But... I like NURBS!
I cannot comprehend NURBs.
> POV is the Best, no discussion.
Ray tracers? Yah, it pretty much is... :-D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:32:39 +0100, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
> But I've
> just been flamed yet again (and not by the same person either), so
> clearly I'm just not wanted there. :-(
It's always possible for people to disagree, Andy. If we all agreed on
everything, life would be boring.
Don't take the flames personally, just laugh 'em off. It takes practice.
Oh, and welcome back. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> It's always possible for people to disagree, Andy. If we all agreed on
> everything, life would be boring.
>
> Don't take the flames personally, just laugh 'em off. It takes practice.
Well, as I say, this is now about the 5th time I've been told to shut
up. And I've only been on the forum a few months. (And it's not even
like it's always the same guy either...)
The first few times, I thought "hey, that's a bit harsh". But it's
happened too many times now.
> Oh, and welcome back. :-)
Heh. Thanks.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:57:03 +0100, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>> It's always possible for people to disagree, Andy. If we all agreed on
>> everything, life would be boring.
>>
>> Don't take the flames personally, just laugh 'em off. It takes
>> practice.
>
> Well, as I say, this is now about the 5th time I've been told to shut
> up. And I've only been on the forum a few months. (And it's not even
> like it's always the same guy either...)
>
> The first few times, I thought "hey, that's a bit harsh". But it's
> happened too many times now.
Well, maybe then it isn't the place for you - maybe lurk for a while and
see how people interact and then pop back after a few months.
Sometimes it helps to learn the dynamic of a group first. (I actually
lurked *here* for several months before posting anything)
>> Oh, and welcome back. :-)
>
> Heh. Thanks.
:-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
