Mike Raiford wrote:
> Lance Birch wrote:
> 
>>
>> Well that's very flattering, but nature does most of the work for me ;)
>>
> 
> Heh, Yes... but to reproduce nature on a computer screen so beautifully ...
> 
> Are you a Canon user?

Nikon, although my friends are all Canon users so I know a reasonable 
amount about them as well :)

> http://photography-on-the.net/forum is one of the forums I frequent. 
> You'd fit right in, unless you're already on there (And if so, PM Guineh 
> (me))

I'll check it out :)  In general I try to stay away from such sites, 
because hearing about everyone else's new toys makes me want to buy more 
equipment ;)  Speaking of which, I just realised that I damaged my camera 
on my snow holiday.  I dropped it onto a snowgrooming machine but at the 
time it didn't seem to result in any issues (and I've been using it since 
without any problems) - however, I just discovered its onboard flash no 
longer works, so I guess it did do some damage after all.  Hmm.  Upgrade 
time? xD

>> Speaking of new photos, I'll be posting some new ones over the next 
>> several days from my trip to the snow (and then after that will come 
>> the ones from my trip to Fraser Island, which is a spectacular place!).
> 
> Looking forward to it.

Should be a new one online in the next hour or so :)

Lance.

thezone - thezone.firewave.com.au

Post a reply to this message

Nicolas Alvarez wrote:

>> Yes that's right, "web log" => "weblog" => "blog", which is part of 
>> the reason I've never liked the term, heh.  It seems a bit silly to 
>> join and shorten the result - "blog" doesn't sound very elegant to my 
>> ears. Never-the-less, that's what we're stuck with now ;)
> 
> Too similar to "bleargh"?

Something like that :)

Lance.

thezone - thezone.firewave.com.au

Post a reply to this message