 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v3" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
news:46d4729c$1@news.povray.org...
> > Nice stats. This is what I get from Wordpress.
>
> Interesting. I'm using WP, but it doesn't offer me any stats. (The stats
> I showed are from 1&1's own stats panel. I think I saw somewhere that
> it's powered by Webalyser, but I might be wrong...)
These are offered by wordpress.com. If the blog is hosted elsewhere using
the wordpress engine, no fancy stats.
> I would think *all* of the hits from Windoze NT are probably *me*. :-$
Nice thing about the wordpress stats, they don't include my visits to the
blog.
>
> I notice that both of our blogs get the majority of our hits from Mr
> FlipC...
I seem to get the majority from search engines (16 vs 2 from flipC), but
then, the only external link that I know of, other than from other wordpress
pages, is on FlipC's site
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v3 wrote:
> 98% of the page views are for various admin-related URLs. The first
> *post* URL is in 13th place, with > 1% of the hits.
>
> Attached are various other charts.
>
> (OK, which freak used Lynx??)
>
Not me, I am the chello.nl at win2k
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:23:55 +0100, Orchid XP v3 wrote:
>>> Blog.
>>>
>>> (Which nobody is reading... apparently...)
>>
>> Put the URL in your sig, for starters.
>
> Yeah, I guess.
>
> Any idea how I do that?
Probably a setting in your Thunderbird preferences.
> I mentioned it here. That's advertised it to just about every human
> that's going to *care*. ;-)
You don't know that. I think we've had this discussion before....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:46:47 +0200, Gail Shaw wrote:
> That's a fact. I still have no comments (no, that's not a hint), but so
> far over 150 views, 26 today, best ever. Just wish I knew who these
> people were.
That's one of the things I like about Wordpress.com - you get some pretty
decent stats on stuff like that.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:09:17 +0100, Orchid XP v3 wrote:
> I would think *all* of the hits from Windoze NT are probably *me*. :-$
Unlikely, NT is still used by a lot of organizations....
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v3 wrote:
> (OK, which freak used Lynx??)
I use Lynx and ELinks frequently. Best way to read certain sites.
But it wasn't me, as I don't have a clue what your blog's URL is. Most
likely you posted it on a thread that I killed, so it never showed up on
my side.
--
"A man doesn't know what happiness is until he's married. By then it's
too late." - Frank Sinatra
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> You can't really expect people to
>> read your blog if you don't advertise it at all.
>
> I mentioned it here. That's advertised it to just about every human
> that's going to *care*. ;-)
I forgot the URL.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:48:24 +0100, Gail Shaw sa dot com>
<"<initialsurname"@sentech> did spake, saying:
>
> "Orchid XP v3" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
> news:46d45feb@news.povray.org...
>> 98% of the page views are for various admin-related URLs. The first
>> *post* URL is in 13th place, with > 1% of the hits.
>>
>> Attached are various other charts.
>>
>> (OK, which freak used Lynx??)
>
> Wasn't me.
>
>> Wait... MacOS...? What the...??
>
> Windows 98????
Hi :-)
Does prove that the 51% XP isn't just me clicking on my own link and
creating the 50% referral though.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v3 wrote:
>
> Wait... MacOS...? What the...??
Who is the Vista Masochist?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v3 wrote:
>>> Blog.
>>>
>>> (Which nobody is reading... apparently...)
>>
>> Put the URL in your sig, for starters.
>
> Yeah, I guess.
>
> Any idea how I do that?
>
Google Damn it!!!!
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Signatures_(Thunderbird)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
