On 7/17/24 21:08, Bald Eagle wrote:
> "Hj. Malthaner" <me@home> wrote:
> 
>> In regard to the parser,
> 
> Maybe before you get too far into that, take a look at:
>
https://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2011/03/19/pratt-parsers-expression-parsing-made-easy/

Interesting, I had not heard of PRATT parsers before.

I think I'll stick with a recursive descent parser though, because it's 
a more widely known approach, even if the code is less compact.

The structure of a recursive descent parser resembles the grammar quite 
closely which a benefit too, I think, with the grammar being of the docs 
already.

Post a reply to this message