"Saul F. Luizaga" <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> irrelevant posts

you can read using RSS and skip what isn't of interest. Yes, old tech.

ingo

Post a reply to this message

On 07/09/2024 18:59, ingo wrote:
> "Saul F. Luizaga" <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>> irrelevant posts
> 
> you can read using RSS and skip what isn't of interest. Yes, old tech.
> 


RSS ?

The last message dates from December 2021.
May be another link than <http://www.povray.org/rss.xml> ?



For my part, I've always used and still use NNTP.

-- 
Kurtz le pirate
Compagnie de la Banquise

Post a reply to this message

kurtz le pirate <kur### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

> RSS ?
>


http://news.povray.org/rss/

I never came around setting up my old newsreader, Xnews, again. The one in
thunderbird I don't like.

ingo

Post a reply to this message

Le 2024-09-06 à 15:41, Saul F. Luizaga a écrit :
> TL;DR
> Wen?
> 
> TL;DR:
> Why is this not in Discord, a lot more fluid and organized, 'coz the Web
> Newsgroup template kinda of sucks: I used Ex-Mozilla Thunderbird and it gives a
> nice structure but still I need to read a lot of irrelevant posts to get to
> something important, so the solution for irrelevant posts is Discord, and leave
> the important stuff for the Newsgroup
> 
Discord is a real time discussion platform. It's good for a conference 
or a team meeting. I use it for some role playing cessions where most 
players can't meet in person.
For non-synchronous interaction, it don't hold a candle to a good old 
news group.

Then, what is important for you may be irrelevant to someone else, and 
what is irrelevant for you may be very important for someone else.

If you are in a thread that you don't care about, you can use the «T» to 
mark it all read and skip to the next unread message.

Post a reply to this message

On 9/7/24 18:57, ingo wrote:

>> TL;DR:
> 
> We communicate nearly as slow as we render, so no need for real time chat.
> 

    And if we need a realtime chat, we have an (almost empty :)
    IRC channel #povray on https://libera.chat/ !

-- 
+++
                      tTh des Bourtoulots
+++

Post a reply to this message

hi,

"ingo" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> kurtz le pirate <kur### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > RSS ?
>
> http://news.povray.org/rss/

I use <http://news.povray.org/digest/messages/rss/>, guessing they're the same.


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message

On 08/09/2024 19:27, jr wrote:
> hi,
> 
> "ingo" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>> kurtz le pirate <kur### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>>> RSS ?
>>
>> http://news.povray.org/rss/
> 
> I use <http://news.povray.org/digest/messages/rss/>, guessing they're the same.
> 
> 
> regards, jr.
> 


Oh yes, it works !
Thanks




-- 
Kurtz le pirate
Compagnie de la Banquise

Post a reply to this message

On 8/9/2024 08:05, tTh wrote:
> On 9/7/24 18:57, ingo wrote:
> 
>>> TL;DR:
>>
>> We communicate nearly as slow as we render, so no need for real time 
>> chat.
>>
> 
>     And if we need a realtime chat, we have an (almost empty :)
>     IRC channel #povray on https://libera.chat/ !
> 
That nobody uses, IRC is ancient rustic and nobody cares for it; if you 
less attention from the Internet, keep ignoring current trends

Post a reply to this message

Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> On 8/9/2024 08:05, tTh wrote:
> > On 9/7/24 18:57, ingo wrote:

> >> We communicate nearly as slow as we render, so no need for real time
> >> chat.

Usually true - unless there's something under development by 2 or more people.
Then the posting to forum method is annoyingly slow.

> That nobody uses, IRC is ancient rustic and nobody cares for it; if you
> less attention from the Internet, keep ignoring current trends

Project management software has been suggested before, and would facilitate
working on small group or POV-Ray 4.0 development, in the instances where people
needed to iterate with realtime feedback while they had the opportunity, lest it
expire and real life once again took priority.

https://news.povray.org/povray.pov4.discussion.general/message/%3Cweb.66807cdd4bc5dc751f9dae3025979125%40news.povray.or
g%3E/#%3Cweb.66807cdd4bc5dc751f9dae3025979125%40news.povray.org%3E

It would be great if the chat logs could be saved and archived, so that the
development, debugging, and solution(s) would be available to the community
afterwards.  I'd hate to lose that aspect of the forum posts.

- BW

Post a reply to this message

On 13/9/2024 11:45, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> On 8/9/2024 08:05, tTh wrote:
>>> On 9/7/24 18:57, ingo wrote:
> 
>>>> We communicate nearly as slow as we render, so no need for real time
>>>> chat.
> 
> Usually true - unless there's something under development by 2 or more people.
> Then the posting to forum method is annoyingly slow.
> 
>> That nobody uses, IRC is ancient rustic and nobody cares for it; if you
>> less attention from the Internet, keep ignoring current trends
> 
> Project management software has been suggested before, and would facilitate
> working on small group or POV-Ray 4.0 development, in the instances where people
> needed to iterate with realtime feedback while they had the opportunity, lest it
> expire and real life once again took priority.
> 
>
https://news.povray.org/povray.pov4.discussion.general/message/%3Cweb.66807cdd4bc5dc751f9dae3025979125%40news.povray.or
> g%3E/#%3Cweb.66807cdd4bc5dc751f9dae3025979125%40news.povray.org%3E
> 
> It would be great if the chat logs could be saved and archived, so that the
> development, debugging, and solution(s) would be available to the community
> afterwards.  I'd hate to lose that aspect of the forum posts.
> 
> - BW
> 
People just opposed like morons: hey bunch of, what part of 
irrelevant/casual chat you didn't get? my post clearly states that; it 
attracts people, it's like a online FAQ and might get more people 
involved in every capacity: users and devs. of it, which is what this 
project needs to stay alive.

If you ignore the message and just justify a negative 'coz it's the sum 
of all your fears, it is in fact, still a dumbass answer get it? Noen of 
you gave a valid justification, just "No" 'coz you want to touch my whee 
whee or something equally stupid

Post a reply to this message