 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/9/2024 14:13, jr wrote:
> Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>> ... the proper way to do it,
>> it shouldn't be some random person to make the Discord Server, it should
>> be made by the people in charge of POV-Ray, like they're in charge of
>> the POV-Ray Server.
>
> says the person of words. wanting "someone in charge", not prepared to even do
> some work for themselves _and_ the community. </sigh>
>
>
> regards, jr.
>
I'm sorry, that you didn't have a father figure that taught you
hierarchical order or things in life and people's organizations, but
yeah that's how the World works better. So you want me to make some work
while being practically a stranger to this community? what else you're
being lazy but control remoting people about? Snowflake?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi,
Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> ...
> Oh now you're not guilty of anything, know nothing about it and of
> course your lack of reading comprehension is my lack of spellchecking,
> not yours at all whatsoever... not playing the fool at all neither
</shrug> a German might say "Wie man in den Wald ruft, so schallt es heraus".
> Oh yeah, I had to ask twice for you to come with the answer to an
> ambiguous 2 letter word. BTW Regarding is like this "Re:" your lack of
> letter composition is... lacking, you Snowflake
fair comment. fwiw, I do aim to be consistent in my deviation from the norm.
> > says the person of words. wanting "someone in charge", not prepared to even do
> > some work for themselves _and_ the community. </sigh>
>
> ... So you want me to make some work while being practically a stranger to this
community? what else you're being la
zy but control remoting people about? Snowflake?
try "rational". _if_ you had some kind of group set up on ${service}, and got
"usage", then you could come here and ask, with some justification, whether that
group wouldn't be better "housed" in "official" POV-Ray, or linked to, etc.
but, so far, words, ideas only. well, as the saying goes, "words are cheap".
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/9/2024 15:25, jr wrote:
> hi,
>
> Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> ...
>> Oh now you're not guilty of anything, know nothing about it and of
>> course your lack of reading comprehension is my lack of spellchecking,
>> not yours at all whatsoever... not playing the fool at all neither
>
> </shrug> a German might say "Wie man in den Wald ruft, so schallt es heraus".
>
>
>> Oh yeah, I had to ask twice for you to come with the answer to an
>> ambiguous 2 letter word. BTW Regarding is like this "Re:" your lack of
>> letter composition is... lacking, you Snowflake
>
> fair comment. fwiw, I do aim to be consistent in my deviation from the norm.
>
>
>>> says the person of words. wanting "someone in charge", not prepared to even do
>>> some work for themselves _and_ the community. </sigh>
>>
>> ... So you want me to make some work while being practically a stranger to this
community? what else you're being la
> zy but control remoting people about? Snowflake?
>
> try "rational". _if_ you had some kind of group set up on ${service}, and got
> "usage", then you could come here and ask, with some justification, whether that
> group wouldn't be better "housed" in "official" POV-Ray, or linked to, etc.
> but, so far, words, ideas only. well, as the saying goes, "words are cheap".
>
>
> regards, jr.
>
A Bolivian would say: no estoy proyectando sobre tí, pobre imbecil
Yeah, you're abnormal and moronic, yet you think you're rational; not
contradiction at all.
Yeah, I'm not going to work for you for free, Fritz; but you seem to
know a lot, then why don't you do it? hypocrite Communist
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi.
this .. conversation is (by now) somewhat fanciful and well "off-topic", and the
tone decidedly "juvenile" ;-). a last reply though, I cannot resist :-).
Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>
> Yeah, you're abnormal and moronic, yet you think you're rational; not
> contradiction at all.
>
> Yeah, I'm not going to work for you for free, Fritz; but you seem to
> know a lot, then why don't you do it? hypocrite Communist
do you really think that you could create something -- anything -- which would
tempt me to use "social media" ? "bring it on" </big-grin>
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 06/09/2024 22:41, Saul F. Luizaga wrote:
> Why is this not in Discord, a lot more fluid and organized, ...
>
As I can see Discord is not much popular here, why not to discuss
Telegram usage - it's in the focus of internet community now :)
--
YB
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/9/2024 17:17, jr wrote:
> hi.
>
> this .. conversation is (by now) somewhat fanciful and well "off-topic", and the
> tone decidedly "juvenile" ;-). a last reply though, I cannot resist :-).
>
>
> Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> A Bolivian would say: no estoy proyectando sobre tí, pobre imbecil
>>
>> Yeah, you're abnormal and moronic, yet you think you're rational; not
>> contradiction at all.
>>
>> Yeah, I'm not going to work for you for free, Fritz; but you seem to
>> know a lot, then why don't you do it? hypocrite Communist
>
> do you really think that you could create something -- anything -- which would
> tempt me to use "social media" ? "bring it on" </big-grin>
>
>
> regards, jr.
>
Haha Reverse Psychology? Yes, I created an erection, now suck it and go
tell your friends on social media
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/9/2024 18:01, yesbird wrote:
> On 06/09/2024 22:41, Saul F. Luizaga wrote:
>> Why is this not in Discord, a lot more fluid and organized, ...
>>
>
> As I can see Discord is not much popular here, why not to discuss
> Telegram usage - it's in the focus of internet community now :)
> --
> YB
>
TBH I used to hate Discord with a passion, starting with the dumbass
name, but I learned the functions and is nice once you figure it out and
it has improved its very confusing GUI over time, so it's perfect as a
modern IRC 2.0. Telegram is just the classical chat, but yeah that could
work too, but as a second channel, not as good and versatile as Discord
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 14/9/2024 01:27, Saul Luizaga wrote:
> On 13/9/2024 18:01, yesbird wrote:
>> On 06/09/2024 22:41, Saul F. Luizaga wrote:
>>> Why is this not in Discord, a lot more fluid and organized, ...
>>>
>>
>> As I can see Discord is not much popular here, why not to discuss
>> Telegram usage - it's in the focus of internet community now :)
>> --
>> YB
>>
> TBH I used to hate Discord with a passion, starting with the dumbass
> name, but I learned the functions and is nice once you figure it out and
> it has improved its very confusing GUI over time, so it's perfect as a
> modern IRC 2.0. Telegram is just the classical chat, but yeah that could
> work too, but as a second channel, not as good and versatile as Discord
There's a Telegram Russian channel with 3 members. I just checked
Channels are not longer possible on Telegram, unless you pay probably,
so I'm not creating 1
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kids, can you go play somewhere else and let this group
talk about POVRay ?
--
Kurtz le pirate
Compagnie de la Banquise
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 14/9/2024 03:10, kurtz le pirate wrote:
>
> Kids, can you go play somewhere else and let this group
> talk about POVRay ?
>
Exactly my point
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
