|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>
> or perhaps not :-). the C source code mentioned by ingo comes with a nice
> little PDF summarising the alphabet + actions available. been thinking that if
> we could agree (here) on a similar (or same) "standard", then all our "stuff" on
> the subject would become interoperable.
>
Hi jr,
I definitely agree with you about your idea of standardisation.
Wouldn't be a big thing to do - yeah, sounds blue-eyed.
The only catch I see at the moment is:
In LSystems they use "\" and "/" for 'roll clockwise' and 'roll
counter-clockwise'
and one of these ASCII chars collides with Povray's internal settings.
But I guess we can find a workaround.
>
> > ...
> > - to jr who always found the right words to cheer me up
>
> good, good, invoice is on its way.. ;-)
>
Hey, you are going to ruin an old man ...:-)). Can I pay in installments??
Cheers, Droj
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hi,
"Droj" <803### [at] drojde> wrote:
> ...
> I definitely agree with you about your idea of standardisation.
> Wouldn't be a big thing to do - yeah, sounds blue-eyed.
it occurs that if there's movement (engagement,cooperation) and an eventual
outcome, we could add a 'Lindenmayer' page to the wiki.
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 2023-07-27 à 19:07, Droj a écrit :
> "jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>
>>
>> or perhaps not :-). the C source code mentioned by ingo comes with a nice
>> little PDF summarising the alphabet + actions available. been thinking that if
>> we could agree (here) on a similar (or same) "standard", then all our "stuff" on
>> the subject would become interoperable.
>>
> Hi jr,
>
> I definitely agree with you about your idea of standardisation.
> Wouldn't be a big thing to do - yeah, sounds blue-eyed.
>
> The only catch I see at the moment is:
> In LSystems they use "\" and "/" for 'roll clockwise' and 'roll
> counter-clockwise'
> and one of these ASCII chars collides with Povray's internal settings.
> But I guess we can find a workaround.
>
>>
>>> ...
>>> - to jr who always found the right words to cheer me up
>>
>> good, good, invoice is on its way.. ;-)
>>
> Hey, you are going to ruin an old man ...:-)). Can I pay in installments??
>
> Cheers, Droj
>
>
>
>
Yes, the «/» is used as an escape character.
Simple workaround that should work
Use this : «//»
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jr" <cre### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> hi,
>
> "Droj" <803### [at] drojde> wrote:
> > ...
> > I definitely agree with you about your idea of standardisation.
> > Wouldn't be a big thing to do - yeah, sounds blue-eyed.
>
> it occurs that if there's movement (engagement,cooperation) and an eventual
> outcome, we could add a 'Lindenmayer' page to the wiki.
>
>
> regards, jr.
Hi,
I guess there will be movement especially when TOK publishes his 3D version.
A 'Lindenmayer' page: that sounds intriguing.
Just let me know what I can do.
Cheers, Droj
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |