 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/18/2018 01:22 AM, Mike Horvath wrote:
> On 1/15/2018 6:34 PM, Bald Eagle wrote:
>> I think it's been mentioned that the wiki is the best place to keep up
>> with the
>> documentation. I only use online help for posting links, for "real"
>> help I use
>> the F1 Help, or the Insert Menu examples, or Friederich Lohmueller's
>> site.
>
> Unfortunately, Google prefers the POV 3.6 docs to the wiki.
Yeah I hate that.
Qt has the same problem. Google likes Qt-4.8 over Qt-5.10.
--
dik
Rendered 344576 of 345600 pixels (99%)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 17.01.2018 um 20:38 schrieb Thorsten Froehlich:
> It is meant to explain that you should insert the image height and width - 3.6
> had no image width and height keywords.
It had; `image_width` and `image_height` were introduced with POV-Ray v3.5.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1/18/2018 1:51 AM, dick balaska wrote:
> On 01/18/2018 01:22 AM, Mike Horvath wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, Google prefers the POV 3.6 docs to the wiki.
>
> Yeah I hate that.
> Qt has the same problem. Google likes Qt-4.8 over Qt-5.10.
>
It may be time to retire the POV 3.6 docs and take them down.
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> Am 17.01.2018 um 20:38 schrieb Thorsten Froehlich:
>
> > It is meant to explain that you should insert the image height and width - 3.6
> > had no image width and height keywords.
>
> It had; `image_width` and `image_height` were introduced with POV-Ray v3.5.
Ah, yes, you are of course right - they were real keywords back then and just
converted to defines internally in 3.7.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
