|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Right-o.
"What's blacker than black"?"
"Vanta Black"
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/283562/scientists-discover-color-darker-than-black/
Now if only we could get a monitor to accurately display that...
What gamma setting should I use, and if I tried to access the .gray value, would
it be Grayer than Gray? :O
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 23.01.2017 um 18:53 schrieb Bald Eagle:
> Right-o.
> "What's blacker than black"?"
>
> "Vanta Black"
>
> http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/283562/scientists-discover-color-darker-than-black/
Humbug.
This is not "blacker than black" -- this is just "blacker than the
darkest grey we've been able to create so far".
> Now if only we could get a monitor to accurately display that...
>
> What gamma setting should I use, and if I tried to access the .gray value, would
> it be Grayer than Gray? :O
Use "assumed_gamma 1.0" as always, and specify the colour as "color rgb
.00035".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 23.01.2017 um 18:53 schrieb Bald Eagle:
> > Right-o.
> > "What's blacker than black"?"
> >
> > "Vanta Black"
> >
> >
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/283562/scientists-discover-color-darker-than-black/
>
> Humbug.
>
> This is not "blacker than black" -- this is just "blacker than the
> darkest grey we've been able to create so far".
>
>
> > Now if only we could get a monitor to accurately display that...
> >
> > What gamma setting should I use, and if I tried to access the .gray value, would
> > it be Grayer than Gray? :O
>
> Use "assumed_gamma 1.0" as always, and specify the colour as "color rgb
> .00035".
No problem having r<0, b<0, g<0 in pigments or light sources, and there are some
interesting effects. But you won't see blacker than the un-illiminated grey of
the monitor when the image is displayed.
JimT
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|