![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
From: Darren New
Subject: Re: request to increase 700K limit of 'animation' postings
Date: 29 Mar 2009 14:40:33
Message: <49cfc0a1$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
>> I tried to post a 4537K file to p.b.a
>>
>> Server Povray rejected post to newsgroup p.b.a : Articles may not be
>> lager than 1000000 bytes.
>
> Remember that the server has to convert the file to uucoded text, so the
> file size on the server likely will be larger than on disk.
4/3'rds the size. But it's rejecting a 5 meg file because it'll only accept
1 meg posts. There's just a second setting somewhere that's not right, or
something like that.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: request to increase 700K limit of 'animation' postings
Date: 30 Mar 2009 11:03:02
Message: <49d0df26$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:40:31 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> 1 meg posts
Actually, a little smaller than that. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 30 Mar 2009 11:03:02 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:40:31 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>
>> 1 meg posts
>
So what is 1000000 bytes in the real world?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: request to increase 700K limit of 'animation' postings
Date: 30 Mar 2009 13:39:26
Message: <49d103ce@news.povray.org>
|
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:52:44 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> So what is 1000000 bytes in the real world?
About 976 KB.
(Divide by 1024).
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
> So what is 1000000 bytes in the real world?
Hmm... with uuencoding and all, I'd say... something like a 700k file? ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 30 Mar 2009 13:39:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:52:44 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> So what is 1000000 bytes in the real world?
>
>About 976 KB.
>
>(Divide by 1024).
>
And 0.953674316 MB
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:28:21 EDT, "clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
>> So what is 1000000 bytes in the real world?
>
>Hmm... with uuencoding and all, I'd say... something like a 700k file? ;)
>
>
That's roughly what I remember the upload limit being.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: request to increase 700K limit of 'animation' postings
Date: 30 Mar 2009 15:05:42
Message: <49d11806$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
clipka wrote:
> Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
>> So what is 1000000 bytes in the real world?
>
> Hmm... with uuencoding and all, I'd say... something like a 700k file? ;)
Encoding commonly adds 25% (twentyfive) size, thus the actual file size
limit is 20% (twenty) less than the maximum permitted, thus for 5 MB the
uploadable filesize is 4 MB.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:06:16 +0200, Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trf de> wrote:
>clipka wrote:
>> Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
>>> So what is 1000000 bytes in the real world?
>>
>> Hmm... with uuencoding and all, I'd say... something like a 700k file? ;)
>
>Encoding commonly adds 25% (twentyfive) size, thus the actual file size
>limit is 20% (twenty) less than the maximum permitted, thus for 5 MB the
>uploadable filesize is 4 MB.
>
Thanks for that "rule of thumb"
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: request to increase 700K limit of 'animation' postings
Date: 30 Mar 2009 18:56:42
Message: <49d14e2a@news.povray.org>
|
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:56:17 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2009 13:39:26 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:52:44 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> So what is 1000000 bytes in the real world?
>>
>>About 976 KB.
>>
>>(Divide by 1024).
>>
> And 0.953674316 MB
Show-off.
8000000 bits. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |