 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Renderdog wrote:
> Favorite comment:
>
> My God, it's full of math.
>
Got a warm smile from me too.
Also liked the one that said:
"There are two types of people, those who get POV-Ray and those who
don't" Probably a shill from these servers, still, very well summarized.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
BTW as a result of both the listings, the povcomp server is currently pushing
out a little under one gigabyte every five minutes.
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
JYR <jyr### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> > In fact, the theory is even older: The concept of "radiative transfer
> > theory", which is basically the radiosity algorithm, dates back to 1926.
> >
> > Thus: Radiosity is almost 80 years old, thus it's crap.
> Do you mean that before 1926, a torchiere with an opaque shade casting light
> to the ceiling would only illuminate said ceiling, because the photons
> weren't aware at that time that they had to bounce off the white surface
> and light the whole room ?
Formal theory for modelling this is a bit different.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
One of the dummerest comments:
"'Twin Girls With a Pearl Earring' should not have won. It is mirror images
of the exact same model rendered twice. Every wrinkle in their clothing is
exactly the same. And he (or she?) put some sort of weird head scarf on her
so he wouldn't have to render hair. Shame on you, Rene Bui. '
'Sure, it's better than anything I could do, but it pales in comparison to
the others. '
At least someone corrected him (or her). Vermeer obviously made her (or
him) wear a scarf, so that he (or she) wouldn't have to paint hair. ;-)
--
Jeremy
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jeremy M. Praay wrote:
> One of the dummerest comments:
>
> It is mirror images
> of the exact same model rendered twice. Every wrinkle in their clothing is
> exactly the same.
No flies on that guy!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
what about this?:
>Learn povray in 24 h
>So what is the best way to learn to program povray images such as these?
>Any tutorial links? Free pdf books online? Or is the only way to "learn by
doing"?
just simply cut&paste man!
B. Gimeno
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Chris Cason" <nos### [at] deletethispovrayorg> wrote in message
news:429ca181$1@news.povray.org...
> BTW as a result of both the listings, the povcomp server is currently
pushing
> out a little under one gigabyte every five minutes.
>
> -- Chris
either that, or people finally found the "pr0n-Ray" directory...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ross <rli### [at] everestkcnet> wrote:
> either that, or people finally found the "pr0n-Ray" directory...
What directory is that?-P
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
