 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Anyone have any reccomendations for a camoflage texture I can throw onto a
military vehicle ( or in my specific case, a battlemech)?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Barehunter wrote:
> Anyone have any reccomendations for a camoflage texture I can throw onto a
> military vehicle ( or in my specific case, a battlemech)?
>
>
Try playing with the "cells" pattern.
3.5.11.7 in the manual
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Anyone have any reccomendations for a camoflage texture I can throw onto a
> military vehicle ( or in my specific case, a battlemech)?
There was a short discussion about this on September 27 (2004) in
povray.binaries.images, thread name "Shelter with Military Texture" by
Hans-Werner. It led to the texture posted in povray.text.scene-files on
9/28/2004, thread name "Military texture for Hans-Werner" by Txemi Jendrix.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Barehunter <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Anyone have any reccomendations for a camoflage texture I can throw onto a
> military vehicle ( or in my specific case, a battlemech)?
texture{pigment{color rgb 0 transmit 1}} ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Lutz-Peter Hooge" <lpv### [at] gmx de> schreef in bericht
news:4253deb1@news.povray.org...
>
> texture{pigment{color rgb 0 transmit 1}} ;-)
Now, that reminds me of an item recently in Nature (the scientific
magazine). Scientists are seriously searching for something like this. A
cloaking device in fact.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Barehunter wrote:
> Anyone have any reccomendations for a camoflage texture I can throw onto a
> military vehicle ( or in my specific case, a battlemech)?
You could take a peek at megamek (megamek.sourceforge.net); it contains
not only a very good implementation of the BattleTech rules, it also
comes with some camos (look into the data/camo directory).
Yours,
Alexander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote:
> > texture{pigment{color rgb 0 transmit 1}} ;-)
> Now, that reminds me of an item recently in Nature (the scientific
> magazine). Scientists are seriously searching for something like this. A
> cloaking device in fact.
If the density of the thing being cloacked is different from the
density of air, it will be rather difficult to avoid the effects of ior...
Even completely transparent objects are very obvious because of their
ior...
--
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote:
>>> texture{pigment{color rgb 0 transmit 1}} ;-)
>
>> Now, that reminds me of an item recently in Nature (the scientific
>> magazine). Scientists are seriously searching for something like
>> this. A cloaking device in fact.
>
> If the density of the thing being cloacked is different from the
> density of air, it will be rather difficult to avoid the effects of
> ior...
>
> Even completely transparent objects are very obvious because of
> their ior...
And their surface reflectance and specular properites, or maybe those are as
a result of the difference in ior, I don't know.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> schreef in bericht
news:4253fcc0@news.povray.org...
> Thomas de Groot <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote:
> > > texture{pigment{color rgb 0 transmit 1}} ;-)
>
> > Now, that reminds me of an item recently in Nature (the scientific
> > magazine). Scientists are seriously searching for something like this. A
> > cloaking device in fact.
>
> If the density of the thing being cloacked is different from the
> density of air, it will be rather difficult to avoid the effects of ior...
>
> Even completely transparent objects are very obvious because of their
> ior...
>
If I remember well (I didn't keep the item) they were looking in the
scattering direction.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
