 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
IMBJR <no### [at] spam here> wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2004 16:30:39 -0500, Eamon Caddigan <eca### [at] uiucedu>
> wrote:
>
>>IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
>>> On 7 Mar 2004 15:12:16 -0500, Eamon Caddigan <eca### [at] uiucedu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:48:50 +0100, "Thorsten Froehlich"
>>>>><tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <404b7a76@news.povray.org> , Lutz-Peter Hooge <lpv### [at] gmxde>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unlikely, I doubt there is any sigificant market for graphics viewer
>>>>>>> utilities even on windows. So I don't think support for jpeg2k will
>>>>>>> be brought to other systems by commercial software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Actually, on Mac OS QuickTime supports it. So in just about any decent Mac
>>>>>>OS newsreader and web browser one can view the image inline. Still, there
>>>>>>is no value added by it being JPEG 2000 and in 16 bits per color component.
>>>>>
>>>>> The value is in the better compression.
>>>>
>>>>And the 640x480 filesize limitation imposed by your favorite plugin!
>>>
>>> It's not my favourite, it's a suggestion. I use Photoshop. Lordy, why
>>> don't you try to keep up?
>>
>>Sorry, my list of software you use was apparently out-of-date. Also,
>>which socks were you wearing last Wednesday? I can't find it in my
>>records.
>
> Such childish rejoiners point to someone who is as lazy as the rest of
> the people here and cannot find the correct counter-arguments so they
> go off-track.
Good point, I should learn to stop resorting to such behavior and keep
my posts on-topic and polite, like you do.
-Eamon
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:56:54 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:
>IMBJR wrote:
>> Don't be so silly. How the fuck does posting a new format and then
>> trying to get a serious debate going about it make for a a flame war?
>
>When you descend to insults, profanity, and fail to address in any
>serious way the arguments against your preferred solution, it stops
>being a serious debate and starts being a flame war.
Re-read the entire thread again - I think you will find I was quite up
on addressing the comments. Next time - get the facts in first.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:55:25 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:
>IMBJR wrote:
>> Usenet uses a text-based medium (yes, even binaries groups are
>> ultimately text-based)
>
>Not really. They're based on ASCII, not text.
Splitting hairs to that degree is making you look pointless. Come on,
better reasoning and arguments next time please.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
IMBJR wrote:
> >You need to read the Acceptable use Policy of this server. A short
> >excerpt follows.
> >
> > Users of this news server may not post messages that could
> > reasonably be expected, by today's standards, to cause another
> > reasonable person to not want to use or visit this server due
> > to a feeling of harassment. Personal attacks, exhibiting
> > insulting or abusive behavior, are not an acceptable activity
> > on this news server. Likewise, the use of profanity is also
> > considered unacceptable.
>
> And what has that got to do with image formats? Are you implying an
> image format is like a personal attack for example?
Is reading for comprehension a problem for you? Your continued use of
profanity in this thread IS unnaceptable and may be a sure way to get
yourself banned from this news server.
Trying toning it down a bit, please.
--
News Admin.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7 Mar 2004 17:01:22 -0500, Eamon Caddigan <eca### [at] uiucedu>
wrote:
>
>Good point, I should learn to stop resorting to such behavior and keep
>my posts on-topic and polite, like you do.
Good. Glad you see it my way.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:03:42 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:
>IMBJR wrote:
>> PNG does indeed give large files and I feel this is maddening because
>> some of use still use dial-up modems.
>
>But high-speed access is available lots of places! Why would we nanny
>people on dial-up modems? You're just too lazy to pay for cable, obviously.
I live in an area where the telco has seen fit not to cover properly.
>
>
>-- Darren, not helping any. ;-)
No you ain't. Help or shut up.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 22:24:01 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:03:42 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
> wrote:
>
>>IMBJR wrote:
>>> PNG does indeed give large files and I feel this is maddening because
>>> some of use still use dial-up modems.
>>
>>But high-speed access is available lots of places! Why would we nanny
>>people on dial-up modems? You're just too lazy to pay for cable, obviously.
>
> I live in an area where the telco has seen fit not to cover properly.
I think that's exactly as much of a problem as you think my choice of
computing platform is.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:14:50 -0800, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
>
>
>IMBJR wrote:
>
>> >You need to read the Acceptable use Policy of this server. A short
>> >excerpt follows.
>> >
>> > Users of this news server may not post messages that could
>> > reasonably be expected, by today's standards, to cause another
>> > reasonable person to not want to use or visit this server due
>> > to a feeling of harassment. Personal attacks, exhibiting
>> > insulting or abusive behavior, are not an acceptable activity
>> > on this news server. Likewise, the use of profanity is also
>> > considered unacceptable.
>>
>> And what has that got to do with image formats? Are you implying an
>> image format is like a personal attack for example?
>
>Is reading for comprehension a problem for you? Your continued use of
>profanity in this thread IS unnaceptable and may be a sure way to get
>yourself banned from this news server.
I think you will find I understand quiet alright thank you very much,
but quoting the AUP in regards to a file format is definately dumb.
>
>Trying toning it down a bit, please.
I shall. I don't normaly eff so such, but having someone **** with
your posting is extermely annoying.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in news:404B9EDA.1637618C@pacbell.net:
>
>
>
> Trying toning it down a bit, please.
>
Such restraint. Must be another gorgeous day on the west coast ;) I'll
take the cue from you and stop feeding the troll.
--
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:24:53 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:
>IMBJR wrote:
>> No. Re-read
>
>I rest my case. :-)
You are some sort of legal representative now are you? Hello, this is
a usnet discussion not some legal process. Dear me. Keep track. Stop
letting you mind wander.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
