 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jonathan Hunt <jon### [at] xlcus couk> wrote:
>> > Anyone got a few scenes they want rendering?
>>
>> Sure, I'd like a 24"*36" 600dpi render of Johnathan Hunt's tulips,
>> please. ;)
> Me too! ;-)
You know, I meant to ask. Why did you use the pov focal blur rather than
the Megapov pos process blur? I'd imagine that'd be a lot faster, wouldn't
it? It might be possible to do a pic like the above (ok, maybe not) with
that, or at least it'd not take weeks.
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Sure, I'd like a 24"*36" 600dpi render of Johnathan Hunt's tulips,
>>> please. ;)
>>
>> Me too! ;-)
>
> You know, I meant to ask. Why did you use the pov focal blur rather
> than the Megapov pos process blur?
Yeah, the post process blur would probably have been a lot faster,
but, I dunno, it just wouldn't have been proper :-)
I guess I don't like doing things by halves!
--
Jonathan Hunt
http://www.xlcus.co.uk/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jonathan Hunt <jon### [at] xlcuscouk> wrote:
>>>> Sure, I'd like a 24"*36" 600dpi render of Johnathan Hunt's tulips,
>>>> please. ;)
>>>
>>> Me too! ;-)
>>
>> You know, I meant to ask. Why did you use the pov focal blur rather
>> than the Megapov pos process blur?
> Yeah, the post process blur would probably have been a lot faster,
> but, I dunno, it just wouldn't have been proper :-)
> I guess I don't like doing things by halves!
Yeah, I'm the same way, so I understand
Geoff
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
