POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Request: A Test Render Server Time
1 Jun 2024 06:16:06 EDT (-0400)
  Request: A Test Render (Message 14 to 23 of 33)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Sven Littkowski
Subject: Re: Request: A Test Render
Date: 28 Jan 2016 14:44:21
Message: <56aa6f95$1@news.povray.org>
That one didn't had as many details on the hull as this one. I was able
to even make a video animation of it which is still on YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N1bE1nIIWI

This time, I have lots of additional shapes on the hull, and also
additional CSGs. And not anymore the same computer, only a laptop.
HP Presario CQ57:
Intel Celeron CPU B800 @ 1.5 GHz
8 GB RAM
64 Bit Windows 7

How many hours did you render that part in total to get those 16%?


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Horvath
Subject: Re: Request: A Test Render
Date: 28 Jan 2016 16:18:10
Message: <56aa8592@news.povray.org>
On 1/28/2016 2:43 PM, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> That one didn't had as many details on the hull as this one. I was able
> to even make a video animation of it which is still on YouTube.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N1bE1nIIWI
>
> This time, I have lots of additional shapes on the hull, and also
> additional CSGs. And not anymore the same computer, only a laptop.
> HP Presario CQ57:
> Intel Celeron CPU B800 @ 1.5 GHz
> 8 GB RAM
> 64 Bit Windows 7
>
> How many hours did you render that part in total to get those 16%?
>

His computer is roughly 16x as fast as yours, probably more.


Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Ger
Subject: Re: Request: A Test Render
Date: 28 Jan 2016 18:09:25
Message: <56aa9fa5$1@news.povray.org>
Mike Horvath wrote:

> On 1/28/2016 2:43 PM, Sven Littkowski wrote:
>> That one didn't had as many details on the hull as this one. I was able
>> to even make a video animation of it which is still on YouTube.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N1bE1nIIWI
>>
>> This time, I have lots of additional shapes on the hull, and also
>> additional CSGs. And not anymore the same computer, only a laptop.
>> HP Presario CQ57:
>> Intel Celeron CPU B800 @ 1.5 GHz
>> 8 GB RAM
>> 64 Bit Windows 7
>>
>> How many hours did you render that part in total to get those 16%?
>>
> 
> His computer is roughly 16x as fast as yours, probably more.
> 
> 
> Mike


Have a look here 
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i7-5960X-vs-Intel-Celeron-B800
-- 

Ger


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Horvath
Subject: Re: Request: A Test Render
Date: 28 Jan 2016 18:13:43
Message: <56aaa0a7$1@news.povray.org>
On 1/28/2016 6:09 PM, Ger wrote:
> Mike Horvath wrote:
>
>> On 1/28/2016 2:43 PM, Sven Littkowski wrote:
>>> That one didn't had as many details on the hull as this one. I was able
>>> to even make a video animation of it which is still on YouTube.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N1bE1nIIWI
>>>
>>> This time, I have lots of additional shapes on the hull, and also
>>> additional CSGs. And not anymore the same computer, only a laptop.
>>> HP Presario CQ57:
>>> Intel Celeron CPU B800 @ 1.5 GHz
>>> 8 GB RAM
>>> 64 Bit Windows 7
>>>
>>> How many hours did you render that part in total to get those 16%?
>>>
>>
>> His computer is roughly 16x as fast as yours, probably more.
>>
>>
>> Mike
>
>
> Have a look here
> http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i7-5960X-vs-Intel-Celeron-B800
>

Oops. I didn't realize the Celeron was a dual core processor.


Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Norbert Kern
Subject: Re: Request: A Test Render
Date: 28 Jan 2016 19:30:05
Message: <web.56aab21194cb49dc55f6952e0@news.povray.org>
Sven Littkowski <jam### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> That one didn't had as many details on the hull as this one. I was able
> to even make a video animation of it which is still on YouTube.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N1bE1nIIWI
>
> This time, I have lots of additional shapes on the hull, and also
> additional CSGs. And not anymore the same computer, only a laptop.
> HP Presario CQ57:
> Intel Celeron CPU B800 @ 1.5 GHz
> 8 GB RAM
> 64 Bit Windows 7
>
> How many hours did you render that part in total to get those 16%?


ca. 9 h 5 min.


Greetings to Jamaica,
Norbert


Post a reply to this message

From: Sven Littkowski
Subject: Re: Request: A Test Render
Date: 28 Jan 2016 19:47:57
Message: <56aab6bd@news.povray.org>
Ah. Thanks for telling me. :-D


Post a reply to this message

From: Sven Littkowski
Subject: Re: Request: A Test Render
Date: 28 Jan 2016 19:51:30
Message: <56aab792$1@news.povray.org>
Yip.


Post a reply to this message

From: Sven Littkowski
Subject: Re: Request: A Test Render
Date: 28 Jan 2016 19:53:37
Message: <56aab811$1@news.povray.org>
Me here:
12% after 5 days 4 hours...
It is a shame..........
:-(


Post a reply to this message

From: Sven Littkowski
Subject: Re: Request: A Test Render
Date: 28 Jan 2016 19:56:20
Message: <56aab8b4$1@news.povray.org>
Your system is 13.05x faster than my system.

I think, I have to replace some areas of my ship with meshes (instead of
boxes and such).


Post a reply to this message

From: dick balaska
Subject: Re: Request: A Test Render
Date: 29 Jan 2016 03:17:50
Message: <56ab202e$1@news.povray.org>
On 1/28/2016 6:13 PM, Mike Horvath wrote:

> Oops. I didn't realize the Celeron was a dual core processor.

I have a 4 core Celeron @ 2Ghz in my render farm. It is 4 times slower 
than a 4 core i5 @ 3 Ghz.

Celerons are really slow for povray.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.