|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi.
I try since over ten, 15 years to learn using modellers, but i find them
way too hard to learn. It is much easier for me, to write out of my mind
the coordinate numbers. Seeing all these numbers and functions, I can
easily imagine the scene. Sounds strange, but that's me. Can't change.
Besides, I wished, I could use modellers and therefore meshes...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
But that does not give me information, if there is something like Cloud
Rendering I can use. :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23-12-2015 10:47, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> But that does not give me information, if there is something like Cloud
> Rendering I can use. :-)
>
I don't know. I have heard about render farms from time to time in these
newsgroups here in the past.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sven Littkowski <jam### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> But that does not give me information, if there is something like Cloud
> Rendering I can use. :-)
Go to http://www.povray.org/search/ and type fastclouds.pov.txt in the Search
field.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/23/2015 9:47 AM, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> But that does not give me information, if there is something like Cloud
> Rendering I can use. :-)
>
This thread may be of interest.
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.4fcd1a5e61bffe2de3f6250f0@news.povray.org%3E/
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I try since over ten, 15 years to learn using modellers, but i find them
> way too hard to learn. It is much easier for me, to write out of my mind
> the coordinate numbers. Seeing all these numbers and functions, I can
> easily imagine the scene. Sounds strange, but that's me. Can't change.
Have you ever tried to drive a modeller from a scripting language? You
can write Python scripts to create geometry in Blender, OpenSCAD is
exclusively driven from scripts, and FreeCAD also allows you to drive it
from Python scripts.
Another alternative maybe worth considering, if you are after
animations, is to write a script to drive the GPU in your machine. You
can do some pretty complex stuff in realtime (or near realtime) on
modern GPUs. For examples look up "shadertoy".
> Parsing takes over 10 minutes, rendering takes more than an entire night
> -for ONE frame!
Have you looked down every avenue to optimise the scene? There are
usually a lot of shortcuts and tricks that work to speed up complex scenes.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I did some optimization to that extend I am knowing, thanks to other
users here. I try to declare each item only one time and then multiply
that declared item if I need it several times. :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes! That is the term I tried to describe. Thanks, Thomas. That is what
I need.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Cousin Ricky" <rickysttATyahooDOTcom> wrote:
> Sven Littkowski <jam### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> > But that does not give me information, if there is something like Cloud
> > Rendering I can use. :-)
>
> Go to http://www.povray.org/search/ and type fastclouds.pov.txt in the Search
> field.
After reading other responses, I think I misunderstood your question. If you
meant render farming, then please disregard my response.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, no problem, I figured out. My way of asking was not too exact, either.
So far, all render farms are only commercial. Without credit card, not
possible for me. Alas. And unbelievable. most don't support POV-Ray,
don't even know about it. We need to inform them about POV-Ray, I think.
That will have more than one positive effect, the name will spread
better, too, then. And hopefully attracts over time a few more
developers for this great project (POV-Ray).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |