 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23-12-2015 10:44, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> Asking. why is it not a viable option? And "at the end"? Please give me
> details. Thanks again. :-)
Because Windows 7 will not be supported any more in the near future. I
don't remember the exact date; and Windows 10 is free only for a limited
time.
>
>
>
> On 23.12.2015 03:12, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> ... although in the end that is not a viable option.
>
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Free for getting the installation files, for a limited time, right? Or
do you mean, even when having installed Windows 10 now and using it,
over time there will some sort of fees apply?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23-12-2015 19:08, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> Free for getting the installation files, for a limited time, right? Or
> do you mean, even when having installed Windows 10 now and using it,
> over time there will some sort of fees apply?
>
no, only installing windows.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> On 23-12-2015 9:06, Sven Littkowski wrote:
>> About Windows 10, I have a question, maybe someone can answer:
>>
>> I have currently Windows 7, and download the installation files for
>> Windows 10. Can I only replace Windows 7, or can I install Windows 10 as
>> 2nd operating system?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> as far as I understand it, you /replace/ Windows 7, but you can migrate
> back if you are not satisfied although in the end that is not a viable
> option.
>
You have a 30 days period during whitch you can roll back.
You are beter to do a full image backup of your main installation drive,
typicaly the C: drive before updating to Windows 10.
That way, you are no longer bound to the 30 days limit. Also, if
anything goes orribly wrong, you only need to restore from that image
backup.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, that is a wise and very good advise!!!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22-12-2015 15:56, Cousin Ricky wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
>> For some time now, I find that the "next" button on the Object
>> Collection page does not respond. No possibility to go beyond page 1.
>>
>> Is there a (known) problem?
>>
>> http://lib.povray.org/searchcollection/index.php
>
> In Windows 10:
> - Google Chrome works.
> - Microsoft Edge works.
> - Mozilla Firefox does not work.
>
As an afterthought: The Object Collection page worked well with Firefox
in the past. I guess one of the later upgrades is responsible but I
don't know from which one onwards.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Le 28/12/2015 13:30, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
> On 22-12-2015 15:56, Cousin Ricky wrote:
>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>> For some time now, I find that the "next" button on the Object
>>> Collection page does not respond. No possibility to go beyond
>>> page 1.
>>>
>>> Is there a (known) problem?
>>>
>>> http://lib.povray.org/searchcollection/index.php
>>
>> In Windows 10: - Google Chrome works. - Microsoft Edge works. -
>> Mozilla Firefox does not work.
>>
> As an afterthought: The Object Collection page worked well with
> Firefox in the past. I guess one of the later upgrades is
> responsible but I don't know from which one onwards.
>
>
The HTML (dynamically generated... oh I hate debugging HTML+JS..)
seems correctly formatted (the button "Next" action being
onClick="scroll(11);" ) I was expected some comments inside comments
or similar problem, no such luck.
I'm rusted on onClick, is the semi-colon expected ? Seems ok, as later
linked page have it too.
Another likely possibility is the collision with
Window.scroll(x-coord,y-coord) from mozilla MDN.
scroll is a javascript function (from our searchcollection.js script)
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/scroll
Any opinion ?
Including hints and recommendations about naming scheme of javascript ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iJwEAQEIAAYFAlaBcKEACgkQhKAm8mTpkW1ScgQAzkouI8Txczz1t9mqSj5oxYkd
iU9CNVrgbyu2/eHK6lhCAiOUaTQGPrHe/YabcgFGg5CGtj5CypFwbbZvCDZO4wib
0URGsmUI0zHhIfs/qp1yGJoSnrQ1uNnZ2QO6hc5VTAn1wKyGV2JE9So0IlowD9Ef
nrauBD3KCn5oyrNo2Eg=
=oeon
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 15-12-28 12:25, Le_Forgeron a écrit :
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Le 28/12/2015 13:30, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
>> On 22-12-2015 15:56, Cousin Ricky wrote:
>>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>>> For some time now, I find that the "next" button on the Object
>>>> Collection page does not respond. No possibility to go beyond
>>>> page 1.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a (known) problem?
>>>>
>>>> http://lib.povray.org/searchcollection/index.php
>>>
>>> In Windows 10: - Google Chrome works. - Microsoft Edge works. -
>>> Mozilla Firefox does not work.
>>>
>> As an afterthought: The Object Collection page worked well with
>> Firefox in the past. I guess one of the later upgrades is
>> responsible but I don't know from which one onwards.
>>
>>
>
> The HTML (dynamically generated... oh I hate debugging HTML+JS..)
> seems correctly formatted (the button "Next" action being
> onClick="scroll(11);" ) I was expected some comments inside comments
> or similar problem, no such luck.
>
> I'm rusted on onClick, is the semi-colon expected ? Seems ok, as later
> linked page have it too.
>
> Another likely possibility is the collision with
> Window.scroll(x-coord,y-coord) from mozilla MDN.
>
> scroll is a javascript function (from our searchcollection.js script)
>
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/scroll
>
> Any opinion ?
> Including hints and recommendations about naming scheme of javascript ?
>
>
It works correctly for me.
Firefox version 43.0.2, Windows 7 ultimate SP1 32 bits with all patches.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Le 29/12/2015 01:21, Alain a écrit :
> It works correctly for me. Firefox version 43.0.2, Windows 7
> ultimate SP1 32 bits with all patches.
Here, Firefox version 43.0, Linux Ubuntu 15.10, it does not work.
Hopefully Mozilla fixed it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iJwEAQEIAAYFAlaCKpcACgkQhKAm8mTpkW3wGgP/RiAQKCQMHYKWRwAp40tBc8d2
zhjZnjZWtcole+jMA7dqi6pQHmrxNqpaXp9uBchkbMpTtzJW4cjVqTXzxx9F+4B0
3So4iijiHapUBsucU49MX0KcuYySk41SrQf4/ahzKsGbzrPq95eaav2PBbwTGu4z
HoWnlkvPBaBpNShVhJc=
=vxWQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
