![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Bad. I really prefer the printouts, but you could think of dividing the document
up into smaller chunks to discourage people from printing the whole document
when they will only be using part of it (go greenish..)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> wrote in message
news:web.4a38e634647a8f185fd99d9e0@news.povray.org...
> > Good idea .... or bad?
> >
>
> Bad, I think. Some people cannot read documents properly on screen. If you
are
> green and want to preserve a tree for a hug. Then don't print it out. :P
>
> Stephen
Good point .... my dev system HAD smallish crt screen until recently. I was
constantly increasing the font size when using web browser. The crt
developed a high voltage "tic" and I found a used 17" LCD to replace it ...
What a difference going to 1280x1024 resolution.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Mueen Nawaz" <m.n### [at] ieee org> wrote in message
news:4a38fa2b@news.povray.org...
> > Good idea .... or bad?
>
> Bad.
Because?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Darren New" <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote in message
news:4a390dd7$1@news.povray.org...
> > Good idea .... or bad?
>
> Certainly keep the pdf for people with ebook readers.
Is pdf format more popular than postscript? I'm going to hazzard a guess and
say yes?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Trevor G Quayle" <Tin### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:web.4a3918d4647a8f1881c811d20@news.povray.org...
> > Good idea .... or bad?
>
> Bad idea. Everyone should have the option to print out the documentation
if it
> meets their needs. It shouldn't be up to POV to force a 'green' policy on
the
> end users. Besides, there are always ways of circumventing the
restrictions if
> one really wishes to do so.
true enough!
> At best perhaps include a discalimer to the docs urging people not to do
so
> unless absolutely necessary
probably not a bad idea, although my motivation was more along the lines of
"why write/port code that you don't have to"
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trf de> wrote in message
news:4a391e01$1@news.povray.org...
> There is a good reason why they exist, and I think it would be an
extremely
> bad idea to drop them. They are essential.
Do any specifics come to mind?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"nemesis" <nam### [at] gmail com> wrote in message
news:4a393571$1@news.povray.org...
> > Good idea .... or bad?
>
> I can't believe the amount of people who open a doc and the associated
> tool, than print the doc so they can read while working on the same
> display it was previously!!
I usually don't print docs either, but have to admit that there are times
that I do print certain items and use the margins for notes.
>
> I've been reading on displays all day long for years and still no glasses!
5 years ago had to start using glasses for reading/computer work ...
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
news:4a393a1b$1@news.povray.org...
> and now wear glasses (very weak
> prescriptions for both eyes, but it's enough to have stopped my headaches
> for the most part).
same here .... headaches almost immediately gone!
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"John VanSickle" <evi### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:4a399266$1@news.povray.org...
> We can always plant more trees.
>
> Regards,
> John
Ah ... then I must be doing my part. I'm in the 3rd year of an oak tree
project :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote in message
news:4a39f086$1@news.povray.org...
> And anyway, the 'green' part of this is only
> cosmetic really: most paper is recycled (in my country about 90 %) and
paper
> nowadays is made from production trees that are constantly replaced.
>
> Thomas
Yes and I generally recycle all my printouts when I'm done with them.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |