 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have been learning C# and even though this is not POV related I thought I would
share it with the group.
Enjoy.
http://209software.com/downloads/publish.htm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bryan Valencia <no### [at] way com> wrote:
> http://209software.com/downloads/publish.htm
Instead of an executable, an algorithm would be more interesting.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bryan Valencia wrote:
> I have been learning C# and even though this is not POV related I thought
> I would share it with the group.
>
> Enjoy.
>
> http://209software.com/downloads/publish.htm
http://209software.com/downloads/setup.exe
CGI Error
The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of
HTTP headers.
btw, .exe? Not everyone has windows you know. How about the source instead.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
rafal wrote:
> btw, .exe? Not everyone has windows you know. How about the source
> instead.
It's .NET anyway. How easy is it to compile stuff under Mono?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> rafal wrote:
>> btw, .exe? Not everyone has windows you know. How about the source
>> instead.
>
> It's .NET anyway. How easy is it to compile stuff under Mono?
No idea I don't use .NET.
But normal C++ source would be even better :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> It's .NET anyway. How easy is it to compile stuff under Mono?
If it's not using anything windows-specific, it should run under Mono
without recompiling anyway. (GUI stuff, of course, won't work the same.
But you could probably build it and then output it to a bitmap file
without too much trouble.)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
rafal napsal(a):
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>
>> rafal wrote:
>>> btw, .exe? Not everyone has windows you know. How about the source
>>> instead.
>> It's .NET anyway. How easy is it to compile stuff under Mono?
>
> No idea I don't use .NET.
>
> But normal C++ source would be even better :)
I like Java for Javadoc. And labeled breaks might prove useful, too.
And it doesn't need recompiling across platforms.
--
Linux is only free if your time is worthless
-Jamie Zawinski
Johnny D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jan Dvorak <jan### [at] centrumcz> wrote:
> rafal napsal(a):
> > Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> >
> >> rafal wrote:
> >>> btw, .exe? Not everyone has windows you know. How about the source
> >>> instead.
> >> It's .NET anyway. How easy is it to compile stuff under Mono?
> >
> > No idea I don't use .NET.
> >
> > But normal C++ source would be even better :)
> I like Java for Javadoc. And labeled breaks might prove useful, too.
> And it doesn't need recompiling across platforms.
I would still prefer the algorithm.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
>> >> It's .NET anyway. How easy is it to compile stuff under Mono?
>> I like Java for Javadoc. And labeled breaks might prove useful, too.
> I would still prefer the algorithm.
So, any type of source seems like the best option I guess :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
rafal napsal(a):
> Warp wrote:
>
>>>>> It's .NET anyway. How easy is it to compile stuff under Mono?
>>> I like Java for Javadoc. And labeled breaks might prove useful, too.
>> I would still prefer the algorithm.
>
>
> So, any type of source seems like the best option I guess :)
>
except for Intercal and maybe Assembler :-)
--
the ultimate time-killer:
+a0.0 +am2 +r9
Johnny D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
