POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Pixels per... Server Time
5 Nov 2024 16:38:39 EST (-0500)
  Pixels per... (Message 1 to 3 of 3)  
From: Tim Cook
Subject: Pixels per...
Date: 10 Jan 2005 04:39:35
Message: <41e24d57$1@news.povray.org>
How exactly is this number figured?

I've got a 640x480 render (307,200 pixels) that's been running for 
125.75 hours and is currently displaying 113 pixels per hour, but is 
only 3% done.  At 113 pixels per hour, after 125.75 hours, it would be 
4.6% complete; at 3%, the average rate is only 73 pixels per hour. 
So...what is the source of this discrepancy?

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


Post a reply to this message

From: Tim Cook
Subject: Re: Pixels per...
Date: 10 Jan 2005 05:39:39
Message: <41e25b6b$1@news.povray.org>
Whups, nevermind, forgot to figure in the mosaic preview.

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


Post a reply to this message

From: Maurice
Subject: Re: Pixels per...
Date: 11 Jan 2005 16:17:09
Message: <41e44255$1@news.povray.org>
Tim Cook wrote:
> Whups, nevermind, forgot to figure in the mosaic preview.
> 
And (AFAIK) it's not a moving average. I think it's just the speed of 
the last line rendered.

-- 
Maurice


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.