 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Greg M Johnson
Subject: Is it possible to nail down whether POVCOMP, IRTC, are "Commercial Use" as per Creative Commons?
Date: 15 Dec 2004 23:00:24
Message: <41c10858$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Consdier for example:
https://magnatune.com/artists/license/student?artist=Saros&album=Soundscapes&genre=Electronica
Which points us to:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/legalcode
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Gilles Tran
Subject: Re: Is it possible to nail down whether POVCOMP, IRTC, are "Commercial Use" as per Creative Commons?
Date: 16 Dec 2004 10:04:20
Message: <41c1a3f4$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:41c10858$1@news.povray.org...
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/legalcode
>You may not exercise any of the rights granted to You in Section 3 above in
any >manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward commercial
advantage or >private monetary compensation.
The IRTC no longer offers compensation of any sort so it's non-commercial.
For the POVCOMP, there are prizes (non-monetary compensation) but I could
imagine someone complaining about a winning entry being "directed toward
commercial advantage" even though it doesn't make much sense for this
non-lawyer... If you want this issue to be clarified, the best would be to
ask the question on the CC mailing list and report here.
G.
--
**********************
http://www.oyonale.com
**********************
- Graphic experiments
- POV-Ray and Poser computer images
- Posters
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Peter Duthie
Subject: Re: Is it possible to nail down whether POVCOMP, IRTC, are "Commercial Use" as per Creative Commons?
Date: 16 Dec 2004 19:10:11
Message: <41c223e3@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm not sure about the IRTC, but section 5b of the Povcomp rules has
these subsections:
"Additional requirements for the winning entries"
iii) Submit a suitably sized version of their image to sponsor
zazzle.com for display and sale, for a period of not less than 30 days,
in the competition gallery that zazzle will establish. A royalty will be
paid on sales made through zazzle.
iv) Agree to their image being used for marketing purposes by the
competition and its sponsors for a period of two years, provided that
the image is unaltered (other than applying your signature, resizing,
recompressing it, or as otherwise agreed by you) and that credit is given.
http://www.povcomp.com/rules/
It is conceivable that some people might classify that activity as
commercial.
Peter D.
Greg M. Johnson wrote:
> Consdier for example:
>
https://magnatune.com/artists/license/student?artist=Saros&album=Soundscapes&genre=Electronica
>
> Which points us to:
>
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/legalcode
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Greg M Johnson
Subject: Re: Is it possible to nail down whether POVCOMP, IRTC, are "Commercial Use" as per Creative Commons?
Date: 16 Dec 2004 21:34:00
Message: <41c24598$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gilles Tran" <tra### [at] inapg inrafr> wrote in message
news:41c1a3f4$1@news.povray.org...
>
> The IRTC no longer offers compensation of any sort so it's non-commercial.
>
Thanks for the reminder, Peter, on POVCOMP.
But Gilles, if the POV-Team/ Chris/ whoever is selling CD's of anims, does
that make it in any way a commercial project?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
