 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Daniel Hulme wrote:
> In either case, any interpretation is after the fact and my
> little joke was always intended to be just that.
>
> Grinning to himself,
> Daniel
>
Nah, your explanation is suspiciously elaborate. I think you meant it.
When you realized that you answer was so stupid, you quickly say that it
was a joke. A typical psychological defense reflex. On google you can
find different papers explaining this behavior.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Daniel Hulme" <pho### [at] istic org> wrote in message
news:200### [at] dh286pemcamacuk...
: In either case, any interpretation is after the fact and my
: little joke was always intended to be just that.
:
: Grinning to himself,
: Daniel
Uh-huh... Sure...
=Bob=
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <200### [at] dh286pemcamacuk>,
pho### [at] isticorg says...
> Perhaps it is a bad sign that there are still enough stupid (or
> non-computer-literate) people that one might accept that someone
> actually believes something so stupid; maybe it is a good sign that the
> so-called experts are expert enough to realise implausibility when they
> see it. In either case, any interpretation is after the fact and my
> little joke was always intended to be just that.
>
Yes, well... Considering some of the forums I read, I don't take anyone's
intelligence at face value. ;)
--
void main () {
call functional_code()
else
call crash_windows();
}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
