From: Steve Martin
Subject: Re: copyright?
Date: 7 Jun 2003 18:04:05
Message: <3ee26155@news.povray.org>
Tim Nikias v2.0 wrote:
> 1200x960? That's a weird resolution.
Assuming square pixels, 1280x960 maintains the common 4:3
aspect ratio; 1280x1024 does not.
--
Steve Martin, CPBE CBNT
In article <3ee26155@news.povray.org>,
Steve Martin <ecp### [at] bellsouthnet> wrote:
> Tim Nikias v2.0 wrote:> > 1200x960? That's a weird resolution.> > Assuming square pixels, 1280x960 maintains the common 4:3> aspect ratio; 1280x1024 does not.
But 1200x960 is 5:4 aspect ratio.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
From: Steve Martin
Subject: Re: copyright?
Date: 8 Jun 2003 07:08:03
Message: <3ee31913@news.povray.org>
Christopher James Huff wrote:
>>>1200x960? That's a weird resolution.>>>>Assuming square pixels, 1280x960 maintains the common 4:3>>aspect ratio; 1280x1024 does not.> > > But 1200x960 is 5:4 aspect ratio.
Shows what comes from answering NG messages before morning
coffee... I thought his post said "1280x960". :/
Think I'll go get some coffee...
--
Steve Martin, CPBE CBNT
Steve Martin wrote:
> Christopher James Huff wrote:>>>>1200x960? That's a weird resolution.>>>>>>Assuming square pixels, 1280x960 maintains the common 4:3>>>aspect ratio; 1280x1024 does not.>> >> >> But 1200x960 is 5:4 aspect ratio.> > Shows what comes from answering NG messages before morning> coffee... I thought his post said "1280x960". :/> > Think I'll go get some coffee...> >
actually I meant 1280x960 :-)
--
Bill Hails
net> wrote: