|
 |
in news:3c988556@news.povray.org Gleb wrote:
>> It does not deal with nested multiline comments in the right way.
> What do you mean "the right way"? It seems that POV doesn't support
> nested multiline comments.
Ah, I assumed that because the POV-Ray parser deals with nested multi-
line comments the code coloring would do also. Wrong assumption. Yet I
think it is more elegant when colorizer deals with it.
>> It has sometimes problems with the {}
> Example, please, if possible.
Try the piece of code below. It produces black {} inside the macro. It
produces black }{ after T_Wood7 and T_Wood14.
---%<------%<---
#macro Ring (Rin,Rout,Height)
difference {
cylinder {<0,(-Height/2),0>,<0,Height/2,0>, Rout}
cylinder {<0,(-Height/1.99),0>,<0,Height/1.99,0>, Rin}
}
#end //macro
texture {T_Wood7}
normal {
wood 0.03
scale <0.075, 0.075, 1>
turbulence 0.065
omega 0.45
lambda 2.3
rotate x*4
}
merge {
difference {
object {
Ring(0.561,0.59,0.3)
rotate <0,0,90>
}
box{<-1.2,-1,-1>,<1.2,0,1>}
box{<-1.2,-1,-1>,<1.2,1,0>}
}
box{<-0.15,0.56,-0.8>,<0.15,0.59,0>}
translate <0.95,0,0>
texture {T_Wood14}
}
merge {
difference {
object {
Ring(0.561,0.59,0.3)
rotate <0,0,90>
}
box{<-1.2,-1,-1>,<1.2,0,1>}
box{<-1.2,-1,-1>,<1.2,1,0>}
}
box{<-0.15,0.56,-0.8>,<0.15,0.59,0>}
translate <-0.95,0,0>
texture {T_Wood14}
}
---%<------%<---
Ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
ac