 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Is there anyone who knows when will POV 3.5 ready?
I'm really looking forward to reading the new documentation (MegaPov's
documentation is sometimes poor...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jonathan Rafael Ghiglia" <j.l### [at] libero it> wrote in message
news:3a39393e.5845869@news.povray.org...
> Is there anyone who knows when will POV 3.5 ready?
> I'm really looking forward to reading the new documentation (MegaPov's
> documentation is sometimes poor...)
They are working on it even as we speak. It will be available as soon as
it is done. The provisionary schedule is tight but they hope to stick to the
latest revision of it, barring unforeseen circumstances and/or any other
obstacle. We have assurances that the progress is optimal and that a
satisfactory result is in the works. If there is an advance notification
that becomes public, it will be posted in the appropriate places and all
interested will be made aware of it.
--
on the Florida election procedures is an unstated lack of
confidence in the impartiality and capacity of the state
judges who would make the critical decisions if the vote
count were to proceed. - Dissent : Supreme Court
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3a39393e.5845869@news.povray.org>, j.l### [at] liberoit
(Jonathan Rafael Ghiglia) wrote:
> Is there anyone who knows when will POV 3.5 ready?
Please read the message "POV-Team Status Report - September 1, 2000" in
povray.announce.frequently-asked-questions. It contains all the current
public information.
Basically, the POV-Team is working on it. Nobody knows when it will be
ready, and there is much work to do, but the final feature list has been
decided, so there will be no major additions beyond what has been listed.
> I'm really looking forward to reading the new documentation (MegaPov's
> documentation is sometimes poor...)
If you can't find the answer in the documentation, just ask in
povray.unofficial.patches. That's what that group is for... :-)
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Why everyone is so desperate?
I personally prefer a well-tested and mature program later than a
half-hearted and buggy program now.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
A little off-topic... but great one-liner, by the way. :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hello,
> A little off-topic... but great one-liner, by the way. :-)
Did you know what it does without compiling it?
Lutz
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> I personally prefer a well-tested and mature program later than a
> half-hearted and buggy program now.
What? They still make those? ;)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > I personally prefer a well-tested and mature program later than a
> > half-hearted and buggy program now.
>
> What? They still make those? ;)
I do.
--
ZK
http://www.povplace.be.tf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Zeger Knaepen <zeg### [at] studentkuleuvenacbe> wrote:
:> > I personally prefer a well-tested and mature program later than a
:> > half-hearted and buggy program now.
:>
:> What? They still make those? ;)
: I do.
Half-hearted buggy programs?-)
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3a39ff4d@news.povray.org...
> Why everyone is so desperate?
> I personally prefer a well-tested and mature program later than a
> half-hearted and buggy program now.
Much agreed.
Personally, I don't even use half the features in POV (Plain Old POV), so
POV 3.5, or even MegaPOV probably wouldn't do me much good :-)
Until Moray supports it, that is. Heh heh heh!
-Ian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
