 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Andy Cocker <big### [at] mariner9 fsnetcouk> wrote:
> : doubling the RAM will help POV more.
>
> Only if you are running out of memory with your scenes.
> If not, the CPU speed will help more.
Why upgrade the CPU? Matt says to just start measuring it in Hz instead...
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> Warp wrote:
>
> > Andy Cocker <big### [at] mariner9fsnetcouk> wrote:
> > : doubling the RAM will help POV more.
> >
> > Only if you are running out of memory with your scenes.
> > If not, the CPU speed will help more.
>
> Why upgrade the CPU? Matt says to just start measuring it in Hz instead...
When did I say Hertz in this context?
Another lie?
Why is lying necessary?
--
Welfare may be cradle to grave but with food stamps
you can buy paper plates but not toilet paper.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 308
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:3A25DE11.882EA706@pacbell.net...
>
>
> David wrote:
> >
> > I have an Athlon 800Mhz chip and 256 Megs of RAM. I have found that
having
> > a lot of memory has decreased my render times dramatically.
>
> Having an Athlon 800 hasn't hurt you any either :')
>
> From what I have heard here in the groups, and on some of the reputable
> hardare review sites, the Athlon is a better choice for rendering
> operations when compared to the performance of the P-III processor.
> I for one have been very happy with my Athlon 950 also running
> 256 megs of ram.
I agree completely!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matt Giwer <jul### [at] ijnet> wrote:
: Another lie?
: Why is lying necessary?
Accusing other people about things that you frequently do yourself
is very childish.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matt Giwer wrote:
> > > Only if you are running out of memory with your scenes.
> > > If not, the CPU speed will help more.
> >
> > Why upgrade the CPU? Matt says to just start measuring it in Hz instead...
>
> When did I say Hertz in this context?
>
> Another lie?
>
> Why is lying necessary?
No, only the first lie.
Obviously it was not serious.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
i'd go with the faster processor becuase RAM is always relitivly cheap
to upgrade.
Ol
The Ellis Family wrote:
>
> I'm getting a new computer, and I'm just wondering whether to go for a
> P3 866mhz 256mb ram, or a P3 1ghz 128mb ram? Which would pov be better
> off with, the faster cpu or more ram? Thanks for your time and help.
>
> Hookflash
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
