Ken wrote:

> > But you've already lost the debate to Ken's superior tactics :)
> :)

And then he lost with my 8:28 AM posting.....

Post a reply to this message

Ken wrote:

> Warp wrote:
>
> >   For example, I bet that this:
> >
> > sphere { <1,2,3>*.25, 10*.25 }
> >
> > tells you more about what is happening than this:
> >
> > sphere { <.25, .5, .75>, 2.5 }
>
> That is an absurd presumption. Why should I have to sit here and
> mentally calculate values when absolutes are instantly readable ?

So I suppose the prime factorization of 239 is 239.

--
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/

Post a reply to this message

Ken wrote:
> 
> This one is easy. It was calculated with an electronic calculating
> device.
> 

You give me more credit than I deserve. I just utilized my internal random
number generator :)

Did someone just say "lame joke"?

-- 
Margus Ramst

Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message