|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Kari Kivisalo wrote:
>
> Xplo Eristotle wrote:
> >
> > Still, kook or not, much of what he says seems to hold
> > true in testing.
>
> I agree about image processing operations should be applied
> to linear samples but his "linear" is not linear in physical sense.
> Long time I too thaught that when a gamma correction is removed
> from an image you get linear samples. Not so if the image came
> from any kind of capturing device. POV-Ray samples are always linear
> though :)
Bloody hell. >_<
(Kinda sums everything up, really.)
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Xplo Eristotle wrote:
> Hmm, interesting. Still, kook or not, much of what he says seems to hold
> true in testing.
I've talked with Timo before and he is certifiably a nut case.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |