 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rune wrote:
>
> Peter J. Holzer, I agree completely with you!
I have had my say. If you people disagree with me that is your perogitive
and I will persue this no further.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000 22:25:34 +0200, "Rune" <run### [at] iname com>
wrote:
>In my opinion they don't know how a good logo should be, but I know that
>that is not a real argument. I would like to see more logos of big
>well-known companies.
One of the best logos I've ever seen is Sun's. Very, very nifty and
really simple in design.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote :
<snip keeper list of 3d sites>
Of the ones who had a logo they were, when reduced to basics, of two types,
a shape, or a shape with the name printed on it.
I don't think that Povray should try to emulate those other programs anyway.
It is a whole different thing and deserves the classiest and most
professional of logos.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> It is a whole different thing and deserves the classiest and most
> professional of logos.
This is the point I have been trying to hammer home all along. A logo
for POV-Ray demands a high level of craftsmanship. Simplicity may
sell gas and oil but not POV-Ray.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote :
>
> This is the point I have been trying to hammer home all along. A logo
> for POV-Ray demands a high level of craftsmanship. Simplicity may
> sell gas and oil but not POV-Ray.
>
I get your point about craftsmanship, but don't think it is exclusive of
simplicity. So far we haven't seen a good example of both in one logo (IMO)
but it's out there somewhere. I think we should not give up until we find
both.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Peter J. Holzer, I agree completely with you!
So do I. What would also be great is it you have some way of varying the
level of detail of the logo with larger sizes. You know, like if it's small
you see the general outline, but if it's large you can add more decorations
to it, since they would be visible.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Please remind me of / show me some that are more detailed,
> because I can't think of any.
Simple one OpenGL - http://www.opengl.org/
and sgi's used to be good before it became 3 different coloured letters
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TonyB <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
news:390caa04@news.povray.org...
> >Peter J. Holzer, I agree completely with you!
>
> So do I. What would also be great is it you have some way of varying the
> level of detail of the logo with larger sizes. You know, like if it's
small
> you see the general outline, but if it's large you can add more
decorations
> to it, since they would be visible.
I agree. The logo should be able to have detail added in the larger
resolutions.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
> Bill DeWitt wrote:
>
> > It is a whole different thing and deserves the classiest and most
> > professional of logos.
>
> This is the point I have been trying to hammer home all along. A logo
> for POV-Ray demands a high level of craftsmanship. Simplicity may
> sell gas and oil but not POV-Ray.
That's why we need a more general approach, that could declinate
into either simple or complex things, following the needs. A global
design could lead to logos, icons, splash screens, mousepads, t-shirts,
CD's, soap, ...
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> In my opinion they don't know how a good logo should be, but I know that
> that is not a real argument. I would like to see more logos of big
> well-known companies.
>
www.soundblaster.com/welcome.asp
The silver man on the right, is the logo of the SB Live! Platinum
And how about the EAX logo? I couldn't find the logo on the Internet,
but I think that most people now it.
Remco Poelstra
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
