-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

my preferences:

>  1 st priority: logo 04
>  2 nd priority: logo 06
>  3 rd priority: logo 11
>  4 th priority: logo 05
>  5 th priority: logo 13
>  6 th priority: logo 14
>  7 th priority: logo 12
>  8 th priority: logo 08
>  9 th priority: logo 09
> 10 th priority: logo 07
> 11 th priority: logo 03
> 12 th priority: logo 10
> 13 th priority: logo 02
> 14 th priority: logo 15
> 15 th priority: logo 01

- --
                              |
                           _-/^\-_
       ________________-_~__( o )__~_-_______________
     (   ---------------    ,/^\,    --------------   )
    (                       () ()                      )
   (                                                    )
  (   El arte de fumigar, no se aprende en una escuela   )
 (  como no se llega a abuela, sin antes pasar por madre. )
(  Fumigar no tiene encuadre, y escapa a todas las reglas  )
(                                  - Vicente Bomvissuto -  )
 \----  Ricardo Miguel Pereyra <rip### [at] toddcomar>  ----/




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 Int. for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgpinternational.com>

iQA/AwUBOPxvVxHKqYbo8t5ZEQIjGACfUytDC8SXifAzNjz4C9kjdW/IgXoAoMYl
O+H3Nl88R/ffW93fvyXGN9bv
=LXCK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Post a reply to this message

> 1 st priority: logo __4
> 2 nd priority: logo __11
> 3 rd priority: logo __8
> 4 th priority: logo __3
> 5 th priority: logo __6


regard
Rodolphe

Post a reply to this message

Nathan Kopp <Nat### [at] koppcom> wrote:
: Hey... I just noticed that #15 is a modified yin-yang symbol.  That is very
: interesting.  :-)

  That's why I didn't like it...

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

Rune <run### [at] inamecom> wrote:
: Keep doing rounds until all logos but one is excluded. That's it.

  I still don't like this. It's very possible that the second and perhaps
the third miss winning by just a bit. It's unfair to discard them.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

>  1 st priority: logo __11
>  2 nd priority: logo __3
>  3 rd priority: logo __12
>  4 th priority: logo __4
>  5 th priority: logo __13
>  6 th priority: logo __14
>  7 th priority: logo __9
>  8 th priority: logo __6
>  9 th priority: logo __5
> 10 th priority: logo __15
> 11 th priority: logo __1
> 12 th priority: logo __7
> 13 th priority: logo __2
> 14 th priority: logo __9
> 15 th priority: logo __8
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Rune wrote:

> POV-Ray Logo Competition - Voting
>
> Anybody using POV-Ray may vote.
>
> I hope as many as possible will!
>
> o The Logos
>
> You can view the logos from here:
>
> http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povlogos/
>
> o The Rules
>
> You make a reply to this message in which
> you specify your priorities.
>
> At the 1st priority you write the number
> of your favorite logo. At the 2nd priority
> you write the number of your second
> favorite, and so on...
>
> You may specify all 15 priorities, or you
> may specify some of them only, but at
> least one.
>
> If you specify some of the priorities
> only, the fields that you specify must be
> the uppermost ones, and the fields that
> you leave blank must be the lowermost ones.
>
> You may specify one logo per priority only.
>
> Note that although some of the logos are
> quite similar, you should vote for both
> versions if you like both versions. Nothing
> is taken for granted.
>
> If something is unclear, please tell me.
>
> The voting period ends May 17
>
> o Vote Here
>
> Use the following in your reply:
>
>  1 st priority: logo __I like logo #4
>  2 nd priority: logo __#6
>  3 rd priority: logo __
>  4 th priority: logo __
>  5 th priority: logo __
>  6 th priority: logo __
>  7 th priority: logo __
>  8 th priority: logo __
>  9 th priority: logo __
> 10 th priority: logo __
> 11 th priority: logo __
> 12 th priority: logo __
> 13 th priority: logo __
> 14 th priority: logo __
> 15 th priority: logo __

Post a reply to this message

Rune wrote:

1 st priority: logo 2
2 nd priority: logo 8


-- 
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message

Rune wrote:
> 
> o Vote Here
> 
> Use the following in your reply:
> 
>  1 st priority: logo 13
>  2 nd priority: logo 11
>  3 rd priority: logo 2
>  4 th priority: logo 5
>  5 th priority: logo 3
>  6 th priority: logo 12
>  7 th priority: logo 15
>  8 th priority: logo 8
>  9 th priority: logo 10
> 10 th priority: logo 6
> 11 th priority: logo 4

Post a reply to this message

"Nathan Kopp" wrote:
> Actually, many logos don't even express what the
> software is.  Sure, it would be great if a logo
> succeeded at that, but I don't think it is
> necessary.

I agree.

> Also, many of these logos (such as #15) are just
> black & white outlines. Such a logo could easily
> be extended into 3D with detailed textures and
> complex lighting.  But in that case the logo
> doesn't depend on the fancy lighting.

Exactly. One thing is the logo, another thing is how it is presented.
That's why I made those low-res black and white versions required. So one
could see what the logos would look like in their simplest forms.

> Hey... I just noticed that #15 is a modified
> yin-yang symbol.  That is very interesting.  :-)

Indeed!

Who made that logo anyway?

<looking up into the sky, whistling innocently>

;-)

Greetings,

Rune

---
Updated March 15: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!

Post a reply to this message

"Warp" wrote:
> It's very possible that the second and perhaps
> the third miss winning by just a bit.
> It's unfair to discard them.

If voting isn't fair, then what *is* fair?

Isn't voting the only way in which all people have evenly great influence on
the results?
Won't discarding the results of the voting be to doubt the judgment of
people?

What other options than voting are there?

Discussion? Many people have voted/will vote in this competition, but only a
fraction of those will join a discussion if one were to be made. I am sure
of that.

And what will the result of such a discussion be? Will the people who have
the best arguments decide which logo wins? Or will there simply be arranged
another voting?

Why make a voting more than once?
The only case it would give different results was if people had changed
their mind for some reason. Why would people suddenly change their minds?

Besides, I don't think a second voting could attract near as many votes as
this first voting. I think people take this competition serious because it
has been planned for a long time, because they think it is a one-time-event,
and because they think the result will decide which logo will be the logo of
POV-Ray (though not necessarily officially). If people find out that we
don't follow up on the result, then I think they will take this whole thing
less seriously, and therefore I don't think we could get nearly as many
people to vote a second time. Sometime one just ought to be a little
consistent.

I would like to hear many opinions on this subject so I know what other
people think. I hope those who agree will also reply, so I get to know it.

Greetings,

Rune

---
Updated March 15: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!

Post a reply to this message