 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I took two of my renderings and re-rendered them at 1280x1024 and sent them
(including a bunch of images from my digital camera) to http://www.ofoto.com
I just got them today and they are outstanding. If you sign up now they'll
give you the first 100 pictures for free and if you use there upload util,
you get another 50. The first order has free shipping, otherwise its $1.99
and 4x6 prints are $.49 each.
I don't have anything to do with them, I just think the picture quality is
outstanding - and if they have a huge customer base, then hopefully they'll
stick around longer.
Mike
www.geocities.com/mikepweber
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: 3D renderings converted to 4x6 photo
Date: 15 Feb 2000 18:25:22
Message: <38a9e062@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oooo...
Just what I needed, Thanks!
"Mike Weber" <mik### [at] pyxis com> wrote in message
news:38a9d4d2@news.povray.org...
> I took two of my renderings and re-rendered them at 1280x1024 and sent
them
> (including a bunch of images from my digital camera) to
http://www.ofoto.com
> I just got them today and they are outstanding. If you sign up now
they'll
> give you the first 100 pictures for free and if you use there upload util,
> you get another 50. The first order has free shipping, otherwise its
$1.99
> and 4x6 prints are $.49 each.
>
> I don't have anything to do with them, I just think the picture quality is
> outstanding - and if they have a huge customer base, then hopefully
they'll
> stick around longer.
>
> Mike
> www.geocities.com/mikepweber
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hope you realize that 1280x1024 is a 1.25:1 aspect ratio and set the camera to
that instead of using the default 1.333:1.
Bob
"Mike Weber" <mik### [at] pyxiscom> wrote in message
news:38a9d4d2@news.povray.org...
| I took two of my renderings and re-rendered them at 1280x1024 and sent them
| (including a bunch of images from my digital camera) to http://www.ofoto.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You are correct. When I rendered the images I forget to take that into
account. Next time I'll know better, but hey, it was free!
"Bob Hughes" <omn### [at] hotmailcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote in message
news:38a9eab0@news.povray.org...
> Hope you realize that 1280x1024 is a 1.25:1 aspect ratio and set the
camera to
> that instead of using the default 1.333:1.
>
> Bob
>
> "Mike Weber" <mik### [at] pyxiscom> wrote in message
> news:38a9d4d2@news.povray.org...
> | I took two of my renderings and re-rendered them at 1280x1024 and sent
them
> | (including a bunch of images from my digital camera) to
http://www.ofoto.com
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yeah, free is always good to start off with. I've bookmarked that site so
thanks for telling about it.
Looks like a brand new company. Btw, have you seen the Management Team link?
Hopefully it's not a bad sign ;-)
Bob
"Mike Weber" <mik### [at] pyxiscom> wrote in message
news:38a9eb8d@news.povray.org...
| but hey, it was free!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Nieminen Juha
Subject: Re: 3D renderings converted to 4x6 photo
Date: 16 Feb 2000 05:20:33
Message: <38aa79f1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes <omn### [at] hotmailcom?subject=pov-news:> wrote:
: Hope you realize that 1280x1024 is a 1.25:1 aspect ratio and set the camera to
: that instead of using the default 1.333:1.
But if the image is stretched to a 4:3 aspect ratio, it will look as it
should. However, if the image is rendered with the camera set to an aspect
ratio of 1.25:1 and then it's stretched to 4:3, it will no be good.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Interesting how this is a commercial solicitation, but IS NOT SPAM. It's
something actually useful and of interest to the members of the group, unlike
diet scams or even offers to sell some 3d plugin.
Mike Weber wrote:
> I took two of my renderings and re-rendered them at 1280x1024 and sent them
> (including a bunch of images from my digital camera) to http://www.ofoto.com
> I just got them today and they are outstanding. If you sign up now they'll
> give you the first 100 pictures for free and if you use there upload util,
> you get another 50. The first order has free shipping, otherwise its $1.99
> and 4x6 prints are $.49 each.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmm, what it really comes down to I guess is what the printer is doing with it.
Still, a 1280x1024 pixel image is going to retain that 1.25:1 ratio unless
viewed at another resolution. I think the printout will be keeping the aspect
ratio of the pixel resolution and won't be anything to do with screen viewing
resolution anyhow for this case of photo printing.
Bob
"Nieminen Juha" <war### [at] sarakerttunencstutfi> wrote in message
news:38aa79f1@news.povray.org...
| Bob Hughes <omn### [at] hotmailcom?subject=pov-news:> wrote:
| : Hope you realize that 1280x1024 is a 1.25:1 aspect ratio and set the camera
to
| : that instead of using the default 1.333:1.
|
| But if the image is stretched to a 4:3 aspect ratio, it will look as it
| should. However, if the image is rendered with the camera set to an aspect
| ratio of 1.25:1 and then it's stretched to 4:3, it will no be good.
|
| --
| main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
| ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What is Management Team link??
Mike
Bob Hughes wrote in message <38a9fa10@news.povray.org>...
>Yeah, free is always good to start off with. I've bookmarked that site so
>thanks for telling about it.
>Looks like a brand new company. Btw, have you seen the Management Team
link?
>Hopefully it's not a bad sign ;-)
>
>Bob
>
>"Mike Weber" <mik### [at] pyxiscom> wrote in message
>news:38a9eb8d@news.povray.org...
>| but hey, it was free!
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I couldn't get a clean URL to it but it's just in the About Us link at the
bottom of the web page there at ofoto. Management Team link on the left side
there.
Bob
"Mike Weber" <mik### [at] pyxiscom> wrote in message
news:38a9d4d2@news.povray.org...
| I took two of my renderings and re-rendered them at 1280x1024 and sent them
| (including a bunch of images from my digital camera) to http://www.ofoto.com
| I just got them today and they are outstanding. If you sign up now they'll
| give you the first 100 pictures for free and if you use there upload util,
| you get another 50. The first order has free shipping, otherwise its $1.99
| and 4x6 prints are $.49 each.
|
| I don't have anything to do with them, I just think the picture quality is
| outstanding - and if they have a huge customer base, then hopefully they'll
| stick around longer.
|
| Mike
| www.geocities.com/mikepweber
|
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
