 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"SamuelT." <STB### [at] aol com> wrote in message
news:3854415B.7898A2D8@aol.com...
> > I don't mind though, if you do a good job, that means less work for
> > me... 8-)
>
> How 'bout we split the job?
>
I think the first thing we should do is ask someone who -has- downloaded
every post (rather than just planned to, like me) to do a search for the
words isosurface and function and zip up all those posts, then we can split
them up and extract them or something.
Peter? Ken?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 12 Dec 1999 16:48:15 -0800, "SamuelT." <STB### [at] aolcom>
wrote:
>And compile them into a sub-list, sure!
OK.
>Peter Popov wrote:
>
>> You guys me want to track all posts that have isosurface declarations
>> in them? :)
Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 12 Dec 1999 20:54:49 -0500, "Bill DeWitt"
<the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> I think the first thing we should do is ask someone who -has- downloaded
>every post (rather than just planned to, like me) to do a search for the
>words isosurface and function and zip up all those posts, then we can split
>them up and extract them or something.
>
> Peter? Ken?
I'm already into it, Bill. The search generated some rubbish and it
has to be filtered out, but I'll post the results ASAP.
Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think we need a web page with a portfolio of functions with their 160x120's. I
think the project is much less valuable without such a list of mug shots.
For example, my isofunctions for "sort of forest," "couch cushion", "supercool
beehhive," etc., are not covered by any precise mathematical term. I think the
ones that are covered- superhyperboloid-- are of little artistic interest or
mathematical value.
SamuelT. wrote:
> Bill DeWitt wrote:
>
> > I was anticipating asking folk to send me a 160x120 and the file which
> > rendered
> > it, is that about what you want?
>
> No, this will be a text-only document. If you can make descriptions of the
> objects near each function, that would be fantastic. I don't know the
> mathematical names of these things.
>
> If you know the mathematical names, you may want to make your own list, since
> it will be more descriptive than mine. I am still going to make my own list,
> however. Thanks~
>
> --
> Samuel Benge
>
> E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
>
> Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Exactly.
That's what I hope to set up. I have a quasi-permanent account that will
hold 10 MB so I can host it for now.
We'll see what shows up there... I'll post a URL as soon as I get
anything up.
"Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote in message
news:3854F2FD.6B408B74@my-dejanews.com...
> I think we need a web page with a portfolio of functions with their
160x120's. I
> think the project is much less valuable without such a list of mug shots.
>
> For example, my isofunctions for "sort of forest," "couch cushion",
"supercool
> beehhive," etc., are not covered by any precise mathematical term. I
think the
> ones that are covered- superhyperboloid-- are of little artistic interest
or
> mathematical value.
>
>
> SamuelT. wrote:
>
> > Bill DeWitt wrote:
> >
> > > I was anticipating asking folk to send me a 160x120 and the file which
> > > rendered
> > > it, is that about what you want?
> >
> > No, this will be a text-only document. If you can make descriptions of
the
> > objects near each function, that would be fantastic. I don't know the
> > mathematical names of these things.
> >
> > If you know the mathematical names, you may want to make your own list,
since
> > it will be more descriptive than mine. I am still going to make my own
list,
> > however. Thanks~
> >
> > --
> > Samuel Benge
> >
> > E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
> >
> > Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial:
http://members.aol.com/stbenge
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I could provide a couple megs from my site if you like. I don't see myself
using all that space (at least for a while).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> wrote in message
news:3854fe15@news.povray.org...
> I could provide a couple megs from my site if you like. I don't see myself
> using all that space (at least for a while).
>
>
Thanks, we'll see how it goes. I hope to get cable here soon, so I will
be switching over to that when it happens. But I don't know at this point
how much space they will provide...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I agree with this, but I have no ftp program or program to let me make .gifs right
now.
"Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
> I think we need a web page with a portfolio of functions with their 160x120's. I
> think the project is much less valuable without such a list of mug shots.
--
Samuel Benge
E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmm, should I just contribute to your list then?
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> Exactly.
>
> That's what I hope to set up. I have a quasi-permanent account that will
> hold 10 MB so I can host it for now.
>
> We'll see what shows up there... I'll post a URL as soon as I get
> anything up.
>
> "Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote in message
> news:3854F2FD.6B408B74@my-dejanews.com...
> > I think we need a web page with a portfolio of functions with their
> 160x120's. I
> > think the project is much less valuable without such a list of mug shots.
> >
> > For example, my isofunctions for "sort of forest," "couch cushion",
> "supercool
> > beehhive," etc., are not covered by any precise mathematical term. I
> think the
> > ones that are covered- superhyperboloid-- are of little artistic interest
> or
> > mathematical value.
> >
> >
> > SamuelT. wrote:
> >
> > > Bill DeWitt wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was anticipating asking folk to send me a 160x120 and the file which
> > > > rendered
> > > > it, is that about what you want?
> > >
> > > No, this will be a text-only document. If you can make descriptions of
> the
> > > objects near each function, that would be fantastic. I don't know the
> > > mathematical names of these things.
> > >
> > > If you know the mathematical names, you may want to make your own list,
> since
> > > it will be more descriptive than mine. I am still going to make my own
> list,
> > > however. Thanks~
> > >
> > > --
> > > Samuel Benge
> > >
> > > E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
> > >
> > > Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial:
> http://members.aol.com/stbenge
> >
> >
> >
--
Samuel Benge
E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think that www.tucows.com could help you with
the ftp program selection. They have a selection
to choose from. They might even have a graphics
program or two to make gifs with.
"SamuelT." wrote:
>
> I agree with this, but I have no ftp program or program to let me make .gifs right
> now.
>
> "Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
>
> > I think we need a web page with a portfolio of functions with their 160x120's. I
> > think the project is much less valuable without such a list of mug shots.
>
> --
> Samuel Benge
>
> E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
>
> Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
