 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I propose that this be adopted as the official POV-Ray SuperPatch Benchmark.
It is superior to the SkyVase image for the purpose of benchmarking the
SuperPatch, as it uses some SuperPatch specific components.
Mark
#include "colors.inc"
global_settings { assumed_gamma 1.0 max_trace_level 25 }
#declare lightDir = vnormalize(<-0.25,3.1,-4>);
#declare lightLen = 1.5e8;
camera {
up <0, 1, 0>
right <4/3, 0, 0>
location <0.0, .15, -.75>
direction <0.0, 0.0, 1>
angle 60
look_at <0,3,20>
}
light_source {
0*x
colour rgb 1
translate lightDir*lightLen
media_attenuation on
}
#declare baseRad = 6371.0;
#declare grndRad = baseRad;
#declare cloudDepth = 4;
#declare cloudBase = baseRad+2;
#declare cloudTop = cloudBase + cloudDepth;
#declare baseVal = cloudBase/cloudTop;
#declare topVal = 1;
#declare midVal = 0.25*(baseVal*3+topVal);
#declare cloudFn1 = function {
pigment {
spherical frequency -1
colour_map {
[baseVal rgb 0]
[midVal rgb 1]
[topVal rgb 0]
}
}
}
#declare cloudFn3 = function {
min(1,
max(0,
abs(4*noise3d(x,y,z)-2)+
0.5*abs(4*noise3d(x*3,y*3,z*3)-2)+
0.25*abs(4*noise3d(x*9,y*9,z*9)-2)+
0.125*abs(4*noise3d(x*27,y*27,z*27)-2)-
1.875
)
)
}
#declare S = cloudTop/(3*cloudDepth);
isosurface{
function{
(cloudFn1(x,y,z)+cloudFn3(x*S,y*S,z*S)-1)*max(0,min(1,z*cloudBase*0.05))
}
eval
max_trace 10
method 2
threshold 0.1
sign -1
bounded_by { sphere { 0, cloudTop*1.01 } }
pigment{rgb 1}
finish{ ambient .7 diffuse .3 }
no_shadow
}
sphere { 0, grndRad
pigment {
color rgb <80,90,94>/255.0
}
finish {
diffuse 0.2
ambient 0.05*<80,90,94>/94
specular 0.3
roughness 0.001
reflection .5
brilliance 0.01
}
normal{
bozo
normal_map {
[ 0.00 waves 0.050 translate -0.5 rotate -132 scale
1000*baseRad frequency 500*baseRad]
[ 0.70 ripples 0.025 translate -0.5 rotate 213 scale
1000*baseRad frequency 1000*baseRad]
[ 0.85 waves 0.015 translate -0.5 rotate 23 scale
1000*baseRad frequency 1000*baseRad]
[ 1.00 ripples 0.005 translate -0.5 rotate 73 scale
1000*baseRad frequency 2000*baseRad]
}
scale 1/100
scale 1/50
warp { turbulence 1/5 octaves 2 lambda 5 omega 1/5 }
warp { turbulence -1/5 octaves 2 lambda 5 omega 1/5 }
scale 50
}
translate -baseRad*y
}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What's the image size????
Mark Wagner wrote:
> I propose that this be adopted as the official POV-Ray SuperPatch Benchmark.
> It is superior to the SkyVase image for the purpose of benchmarking the
> SuperPatch, as it uses some SuperPatch specific components.
>
> Mark
>
> #include "colors.inc"
>
> global_settings { assumed_gamma 1.0 max_trace_level 25 }
>
> #declare lightDir = vnormalize(<-0.25,3.1,-4>);
> #declare lightLen = 1.5e8;
>
> camera {
> up <0, 1, 0>
> right <4/3, 0, 0>
> location <0.0, .15, -.75>
> direction <0.0, 0.0, 1>
> angle 60
> look_at <0,3,20>
> }
> light_source {
> 0*x
> colour rgb 1
> translate lightDir*lightLen
> media_attenuation on
> }
>
> #declare baseRad = 6371.0;
> #declare grndRad = baseRad;
> #declare cloudDepth = 4;
> #declare cloudBase = baseRad+2;
> #declare cloudTop = cloudBase + cloudDepth;
> #declare baseVal = cloudBase/cloudTop;
> #declare topVal = 1;
> #declare midVal = 0.25*(baseVal*3+topVal);
> #declare cloudFn1 = function {
> pigment {
> spherical frequency -1
> colour_map {
> [baseVal rgb 0]
> [midVal rgb 1]
> [topVal rgb 0]
> }
> }
> }
> #declare cloudFn3 = function {
> min(1,
> max(0,
> abs(4*noise3d(x,y,z)-2)+
> 0.5*abs(4*noise3d(x*3,y*3,z*3)-2)+
> 0.25*abs(4*noise3d(x*9,y*9,z*9)-2)+
> 0.125*abs(4*noise3d(x*27,y*27,z*27)-2)-
> 1.875
> )
> )
> }
>
> #declare S = cloudTop/(3*cloudDepth);
> isosurface{
> function{
> (cloudFn1(x,y,z)+cloudFn3(x*S,y*S,z*S)-1)*max(0,min(1,z*cloudBase*0.05))
> }
> eval
> max_trace 10
> method 2
> threshold 0.1
> sign -1
> bounded_by { sphere { 0, cloudTop*1.01 } }
> pigment{rgb 1}
> finish{ ambient .7 diffuse .3 }
> no_shadow
> }
> sphere { 0, grndRad
> pigment {
> color rgb <80,90,94>/255.0
> }
> finish {
> diffuse 0.2
> ambient 0.05*<80,90,94>/94
> specular 0.3
> roughness 0.001
> reflection .5
> brilliance 0.01
> }
> normal{
> bozo
> normal_map {
> [ 0.00 waves 0.050 translate -0.5 rotate -132 scale
> 1000*baseRad frequency 500*baseRad]
> [ 0.70 ripples 0.025 translate -0.5 rotate 213 scale
> 1000*baseRad frequency 1000*baseRad]
> [ 0.85 waves 0.015 translate -0.5 rotate 23 scale
> 1000*baseRad frequency 1000*baseRad]
> [ 1.00 ripples 0.005 translate -0.5 rotate 73 scale
> 1000*baseRad frequency 2000*baseRad]
> }
> scale 1/100
> scale 1/50
> warp { turbulence 1/5 octaves 2 lambda 5 omega 1/5 }
> warp { turbulence -1/5 octaves 2 lambda 5 omega 1/5 }
> scale 50
> }
> translate -baseRad*y
> }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Greg M. Johnson <"gregj;-)56590"@aol.c;-)om> wrote in message
<37ecd74e@news.povray.org>...
>What's the image size????
640x480 with no antialiasing.
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
