 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'll be spending both 2000 and 2001 parties with my friends I think,
regardless of which one is *seen* as the millennium party.
I just find it disappointing that some people don't get what I mean and
actually think the new millennium starts at the start of the year 2000, and
not the real start which is at the start of 2001.
Oh well, I guess the human race will just have to go on being intoxicated by
the media. The name "Millennium Bug" doesn't help the situation either ;-)
--
Lance.
---
For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
Colorblind - http://listen.to/colorblind
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lance Birch <lan### [at] usa net> wrote:
: 1. There is no year 0, the first year was year 1.
: 2. The new millennium STARTS IN THE YEAR ***2001***!!! ***NOT 2000***!!!
: Right? That's what you were saying wasn't it Nieminen?
Yes.
But I have also said that it doesn't matter: All the fun will happen in
1/1/2000 :)
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lance Birch <lan### [at] usanet> wrote:
: I'll be spending both 2000 and 2001 parties with my friends I think,
: regardless of which one is *seen* as the millennium party.
I don't want to be in any place where there are lots of people when
the year changes. Something _might_ go wrong and panic will follow...
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Yes.
> But I have also said that it doesn't matter: All the fun will happen in
>1/1/2000 :)
Extremely good point :)
--
Lance.
---
For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
Colorblind - http://listen.to/colorblind
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Mika wrote in message <37b41a89@news.povray.org>...
>Lance Birch <lan### [at] usanet> wrote:
>: I'll be spending both 2000 and 2001 parties with my friends I think,
>: regardless of which one is *seen* as the millennium party.
>
> I don't want to be in any place where there are lots of people when
>the year changes. Something _might_ go wrong and panic will follow...
That shouldn't be a problem, I don't have many friends ;)
--
Lance.
---
For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
Colorblind - http://listen.to/colorblind
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13 Aug 1999 09:13:07 -0400, Nieminen Mika wrote:
>Lance Birch <lan### [at] usanet> wrote:
>: 1. There is no year 0, the first year was year 1.
>: 2. The new millennium STARTS IN THE YEAR ***2001***!!! ***NOT 2000***!!!
>
>: Right? That's what you were saying wasn't it Nieminen?
>
> Yes.
> But I have also said that it doesn't matter: All the fun will happen in
>1/1/2000 :)
Somebody kill me now and just get it over with. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 22:36:07 +1000, Lance Birch wrote:
>I'll be spending both 2000 and 2001 parties with my friends I think,
>regardless of which one is *seen* as the millennium party.
>
>I just find it disappointing that some people don't get what I mean and
>actually think the new millennium starts at the start of the year 2000, and
>not the real start which is at the start of 2001.
>
>Oh well, I guess the human race will just have to go on being intoxicated by
>the media. The name "Millennium Bug" doesn't help the situation either ;-)
The real Millennium Bug is the one in people's brains that makes them think
a bunch of zeros is the start of a new millennium.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ron Parker wrote:
>The real Millennium Bug is the one in people's brains that makes them think
>a bunch of zeros is the start of a new millennium.
Exactly... Oh well...
--
Lance.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lance Birch wrote:
>
> I just find it disappointing that some people don't get what I mean and
> actually think the new millennium starts at the start of the year 2000, and
> not the real start which is at the start of 2001.
>
Maybe they're just teasing you? It's so much fun - you take the bait every
single time :)
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If we were still using Roman numerals, digital watches would have
to be the size of a house.
Ken wrote:
>
> Lance Birch wrote:
> >
> >
> > No, all I was saying is that in our current date system, according to the
> > date it will start on 01/01/2001 not 01/01/2000 (because there was no year
> > 0).
>
> Why would you need a year zero ? Going by the historical accounts the moment
> that Christ was born would have been the first second of the first minute of
> the first hour of the first day of year one. That is the only reference point
> you need to validate the beginning of a period of time.
>
> On a side note: The Romans had no mathmatical concept for the term zero.
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> See my 700+ Povray and 3D Rendering and Raytracing Links at:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html
--
Cheers
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error reading file mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
