 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Xplo Eristotle wrote:
>
> There is an alternative, of course.. you could simply stop being a
> jackass without having to have some kind of admin yell at you, and
> convert your stupid VCard to a sig, or omit it.
I see that you have done this. Thank you.
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matt Giwer wrote in message <37B195C7.EE4AA401@giwersworld.org>...
> If you are having a problem with the filter, I will dig up the
>docs and help you.
Yes, please do. How do you filter out newsgroup messages from a specified
individual using Microsoft Outlook Express?
Thanks in advance
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mark Wagner <mar### [at] gte net> wrote in message
news:37b3bac1@news.povray.org...
> Yes, please do. How do you filter out newsgroup messages from a specified
> individual using Microsoft Outlook Express?
>
Tools \ Message Rules \ News
New \ When ....... Do ..... Apply
Marjorie Graterol
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marjorie Graterol wrote in message <37b41b3b@news.povray.org>...
>
>Mark Wagner <mar### [at] gtenet> wrote in message
>news:37b3bac1@news.povray.org...
>> Yes, please do. How do you filter out newsgroup messages from a
specified
>> individual using Microsoft Outlook Express?
>>
>
>Tools \ Message Rules \ News
>
>New \ When ....... Do ..... Apply
I don't appear to have a "Message Rules" option in the "tools" menu. Might
this be because I'm using Outlook Express instead of Outlook?
--
main(i,_){for(!_||(--i,main(i+2,i["FHhhTBFHdhTBFBQT\2TBF&]zRF$hh*:FHhh+&FBIs
bDF"]));i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_^=_,"\n")),_/=2);} /*-
Mark -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mark Wagner <mar### [at] gtenet> wrote in message
news:37b4fcbb@news.povray.org...
>
> I don't appear to have a "Message Rules" option in the "tools" menu.
Might
> this be because I'm using Outlook Express instead of Outlook?
>
I'm sorry. I think it has to do with the version. I'm using Outlook
Express 5. I do not remember exactly where the former version had it, but I
am sure I used it. I think is even less complicated. Explore Options and
actions, or help. I am sure it is there. Good luck.
Marjorie
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mark Wagner <mar### [at] gtenet> wrote:
: --
: main(i,_){for(!_||(--i,main(i+2,i["FHhhTBFHdhTBFBQT\2TBF&]zRF$hh*:FHhh+&FBIs
: bDF"]));i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_^=_,"\n")),_/=2);} /*-
: Mark -*/
This looks familiar... Although it doesn't work perfectly.
(Btw, I don't know if I like other people using the exact same type of
signature as I do since it's a very personal signature)
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Mika wrote in message <37b7b70a@news.povray.org>...
>Mark Wagner <mar### [at] gtenet> wrote:
>: --
>:
main(i,_){for(!_||(--i,main(i+2,i["FHhhTBFHdhTBFBQT\2TBF&]zRF$hh*:FHhh+&FBIs
>: bDF"]));i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_^=_,"\n")),_/=2);} /*-
>: Mark -*/
>
> This looks familiar... Although it doesn't work perfectly.
>
> (Btw, I don't know if I like other people using the exact same type of
>signature as I do since it's a very personal signature)
It worked just fine when I compiled and ran it. How is it not working
perfectly?
If you object to my using this signature, I am willing to stop doing so.
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mark Wagner <mar### [at] gtenet> wrote:
: It worked just fine when I compiled and ran it. How is it not working
: perfectly?
[] [] [] [] [][] [][][] [] []
[][] [][] [] [] [] [] [] []
[] [][] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [][][][] [][][] [][]
[] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
[] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
The first line doesn't look right to me.
: If you object to my using this signature, I am willing to stop doing so.
Perhaps I'm a little bit pedantic. However, I think that the people here
are already accustomed to see my signature and recognize it easyly because
it's quite distinctive. I also made a lot of work for that signature.
It's like I made a povray picture and then somebody uses that exact same
picture with a a couple of retouches in his page.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Mika wrote:
> Mark Wagner <mar### [at] gtenet> wrote:
> : It worked just fine when I compiled and ran it. How is it not working
> : perfectly?
>
> [] [] [] [] [][] [][][] [] []
> [][] [][] [] [] [] [] [] []
> [] [][] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
> [] [] [] [][][][] [][][] [][]
> [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
> [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
> [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
>
> The first line doesn't look right to me.
>
I figured that one out. It's because of the line getting wrapped and the
whitespace being included inside the quotes. Change it to one line and it
works right.
> main(i,_){for(!_||(--i,main(i+2,i["FHhhTBFHdhTBFBQT\2TBF&]zRF$hh*:FHhh+&FBIs
> bDF"]));i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_^=_,"\n")),_/=2);} /*-
> Mark -*/
>
>
--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Mika wrote in message <37bbb5aa@news.povray.org>...
>Mark Wagner <mar### [at] gtenet> wrote:
>: It worked just fine when I compiled and ran it. How is it not working
>: perfectly?
>
> [] [] [] [] [][] [][][] [] []
> [][] [][] [] [] [] [] [] []
> [] [][] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
> [] [] [] [][][][] [][][] [][]
> [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
> [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
> [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []
>
> The first line doesn't look right to me.
>
>: If you object to my using this signature, I am willing to stop doing so.
>
> Perhaps I'm a little bit pedantic. However, I think that the people here
>are already accustomed to see my signature and recognize it easyly because
>it's quite distinctive. I also made a lot of work for that signature.
> It's like I made a povray picture and then somebody uses that exact same
>picture with a a couple of retouches in his page.
OK, I'll figure out a new signature.
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
