 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
How about "POV-Ray for Applications"?
rc
Nieminen Juha <war### [at] cc tutfi> wrote in message
news:37e1eadb@news.povray.org...
> I hope they will not follow the trend of software versioning and be
> calling it "POV-Ray 2000".
>
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike wrote:
> Surely not. I'm certain it will be called POV2K.
p2k
-- Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TonyB wrote:
> >Nah, it'd be spelled right. :)
>
> Stupid spanish... aargh! It really messed me up. I'm having serious trouble
> getting ready for my SAT because of it. I don't know any of the terminology
> in english. I just learned what a _mean_ is in mathematics. I feel stupid,
> and I know I'm not.
>
> POV-Ray: Millennium Edition (or POV-Ray 2001, a trace odyssey)
>
> PS: Sorry, I couldn't help myself. =)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There's always the possibility of it being version 3.1z too : ) or
just 3.1h maybe.
With all this speculation hope it doesn't lead to a big let down New
Years Day.
Forever the optimist,
Bob
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:37E321EF.BEA42E3E@pacbell.net...
>
>
> Mike wrote:
>
> > Surely not. I'm certain it will be called POV2K.
>
> p2k
>
> -- Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> There's always the possibility of it being version 3.1z too : ) or
> just 3.1h maybe.
> With all this speculation hope it doesn't lead to a big let down New
> Years Day.
What about :
POV-Ray 3.49999999999999...
(pentium optimised, of course !)
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rejected ideas:
POV-Ray NOW!
POV*
POV-Ray 1900
ROV-Pay (Rays of vision with plugin SDK)
signed,
the rumor mill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
(Yes. I think you'll want to review what you studied in "school".)
PS: Do you get to practice your spanish? How often and with whom?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Now I'm confused. Did I say I studied it for three years, because if I did, I
meant to say I've been studying it for three years. I'm taking it right now.
TonyB wrote:
>
>
> (Yes. I think you'll want to review what you studied in "school".)
>
> PS: Do you get to practice your spanish? How often and with whom?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Now I'm confused. Did I say I studied it for three years, because if I did,
I
>meant to say I've been studying it for three years. I'm taking it right
now.
No. What you said was that you studied it three years ago. What you meant to
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> There's always the possibility of it being version 3.1z too : ) or
> just 3.1h maybe.
> With all this speculation hope it doesn't lead to a big let down New
> Years Day.
>
> Forever the optimist,
> Bob
>
<snip...>
No!!!
Due to the revolutionary features of the new version the POV-team
announces the version number will be reset:
POV-Ray MAX 1.0
;)
Gerald
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
