 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nick Portelli wrote:
>
> Yes networking is easy. As long as it is with winsows. I can't get
> linux to see my NIC because it is a 9.99 special. But dual processors
> will not speed up POV if I'm correct. Does POV use treads? If it does
> it would benefit from mulitple processors.
>
PVMpov does work well in this sort of situations. Windows + networking.
Nothing I really enjoy, I greatly prefer doing that with linux. *humms*
too bad about the NIC though. tried the newer kernels?
//Spider
--Wail of Sumer.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nick Portelli wrote:
> Yes networking is easy. As long as it is with winsows. I can't get
> linux to see my NIC because it is a 9.99 special.
Have you checked what chips are needed and have you looked on
http://www.deja.com/ to scan newsgroups? I thought I was going to have problems
with my cheapie card, but then I recognized the chip and installed it. Zooom! I
was off and running.
--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Do you know if PVMpov exists now in version 3.1?
> PVMpov does work well in this sort of situations. Windows + networking.
> Nothing I really enjoy, I greatly prefer doing that with linux. *humms*
> too bad about the NIC though. tried the newer kernels?
>
> //Spider
> --Wail of Sumer.
--
David Etter Perere
Please remove ".bof" to answer
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
DEPerere wrote:
>
> Do you know if PVMpov exists now in version 3.1?
In v3.1e at:
http://www.luga.de/~flierl/pvmpov/
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank's Ken.
I might (is my english coorect?) say you are answering very, but very
fast.
> In v3.1e at:
>
> http://www.luga.de/~flierl/pvmpov/
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm
--
David Etter Perere
Please remove ".bof" to answer
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote in message <379C26B1.24384A6A@pacbell.net>...
>
>
>Mark Wagner wrote:
>>
>> Ken wrote in message <379B48A0.5961D6C2@pacbell.net>...
>> >I think I summed it up very well in the VFAQ. If you want to play games
and
>> >mpeg movies on your system then by all means buy a good harware
accelerated
>> >graphics card. If speed is a concern in raytracing then buy a fast
>> processor,
>> >with a mother board the has a fast buss, good amounts of level one and 2
>> cache
>> >memory for swapping out instructions, and tons of fast system ram. Then
sit
>> >back and wait cause raytracing is a slow process no matter what kind of
>> system
>> >you can afford to buy :)
>>
>> Actually, there is one system that can raytrace in real time, using
>> massively parallel processing -- the real world. Anyone know where I can
>> buy one? :-)
>>
>> Mark
>
>The system or a "real" world ?
Yes.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Kress wrote in message <379a00af@news.povray.org>...
>Plain PaperTry this link
>http://headline.gamespot.com/news/99_07/23_pc_nvidia/index.html
>
>Looks like the next generation of video boards may start doing some of the
>math currently done in POV.
We seem to get this rumor every few months.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:32:45 +0200, DEPerere <per### [at] bof infomaniakch>
wrote:
>Thank's Ken.
>I might (is my english coorect?) say you are answering very, but very
>fast.
Scary, isn't it? :)
--
Alan
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer
news.povray.org - where POV-Ray enthusiasts around the world can get
together to exchange ideas, information, and experiences with others
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Uncle Ken ain't a person he be a AI.
DEPerere wrote:
>
> Thank's Ken.
> I might (is my english coorect?) say you are answering very, but very
> fast.
>
> Ken a crit:
>
> > In v3.1e at:
> >
> > http://www.luga.de/~flierl/pvmpov/
> >
> > --
> > Ken Tyler
> >
> > mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
> > http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm
>
> --
> David Etter Perere
> Pour me rpondre, enlevez le "bof." svp
> Please remove ".bof" to answer
--
Cheers
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error reading file mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
DEPerere wrote:
>
> Thank's Ken.
> I might (is my english coorect?) say you are answering very, but very
> fast.
>
He is well known for that.. look for replies that come up to an hour
before the questions... :)
//Spider
--Listening to the whispers of the dead.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
