POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Anaglyphs Server Time
1 Nov 2024 21:21:16 EDT (-0400)
  Anaglyphs (Message 1 to 7 of 7)  
From: Tim Dew
Subject: Anaglyphs
Date: 20 Jul 1999 11:24:14
Message: <37943593.B789C9AD@plateauvalley.k12.co.us>
Does anyone know of a utility of patch that will render anaglyphs (those
red/blue 3D pictures) with Povray?  RayDream Studio 5 has a pretty good
post render filter that does it.


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Anaglyphs
Date: 20 Jul 1999 11:33:03
Message: <37949634.B540C49@pacbell.net>
Tim Dew wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know of a utility of patch that will render anaglyphs (those
> red/blue 3D pictures) with Povray?  RayDream Studio 5 has a pretty good
> post render filter that does it.

There used to be one at: http://www.rhein-ruhr.de/~schrammel/3d.html
but the site appears to be not responding right now. It may be temporary
and will be on line later... who can say.

-- 
Ken Tyler
  
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm


Post a reply to this message

From: rico
Subject: Re: Anaglyphs
Date: 20 Jul 1999 12:21:33
Message: <MPG.11fe4f7cec515ac1989687@news.povray.org>
In article <379### [at] pacbellnet>, tyl### [at] pacbellnet says...
> 
> 
> Tim Dew wrote:
> > 
> > Does anyone know of a utility of patch that will render anaglyphs (those
> > red/blue 3D pictures) with Povray?  RayDream Studio 5 has a pretty good
> > post render filter that does it.
> 
> There used to be one at: http://www.rhein-ruhr.de/~schrammel/3d.html
> but the site appears to be not responding right now. It may be temporary
> and will be on line later... who can say.

The address worked for me.  Thanks Ken!

Rich Allen


Post a reply to this message

From: Daniel Pirch
Subject: Re: Anaglyphs
Date: 20 Jul 1999 13:09:37
Message: <3794ad51@news.povray.org>
Tim Dew <tde### [at] plateauvalleyk12cous> wrote in message
news:37943593.B789C9AD@plateauvalley.k12.co.us...
> Does anyone know of a utility of patch that will render anaglyphs (those
> red/blue 3D pictures) with Povray?  RayDream Studio 5 has a pretty good
> post render filter that does it.

You can render two images with moving the camera a bit and then colorize and
merge the images with a program like photoshop or paint shop pro

--
Daniel Pirch
nap### [at] linuxzrztu-berlinde


Post a reply to this message

From: Nieminen Mika
Subject: Re: Anaglyphs
Date: 21 Jul 1999 01:36:16
Message: <37955c50@news.povray.org>
Daniel Pirch <nap### [at] linuxzrztu-berlinde> wrote:
: You can render two images with moving the camera a bit and then colorize and
: merge the images with a program like photoshop or paint shop pro

  I have added a feature to my targa averager to achieve this. It can be
used this way:

average -3 image1.tga image2.tga result.tga

  It takes two regular images and mixes them creating a red-blue image
(ie. it calculates the b/w image from "image1.tga" and puts it in the
red channel of "result.tga" and the same with the second image putting it
in the blue channel).

  This version is not on my web page. I can put it there if there's interest.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: Jon A  Cruz
Subject: Re: Anaglyphs
Date: 21 Jul 1999 02:14:56
Message: <379565AB.3F5BBA59@geocities.com>
Nieminen Mika wrote:

> Daniel Pirch <nap### [at] linuxzrztu-berlinde> wrote:
> : You can render two images with moving the camera a bit and then colorize and
> : merge the images with a program like photoshop or paint shop pro
>
>   I have added a feature to my targa averager to achieve this. It can be
> used this way:
>
> average -3 image1.tga image2.tga result.tga
>
>   It takes two regular images and mixes them creating a red-blue image
> (ie. it calculates the b/w image from "image1.tga" and puts it in the
> red channel of "result.tga" and the same with the second image putting it
> in the blue channel).

Instead of that, you should take the red channel straight from one image and then
the blue and green from the other image. Combine those to the final image. That
should give you nicer results and should process a little faster to boot.


--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.


Post a reply to this message

From: Nieminen Mika
Subject: Re: Anaglyphs
Date: 21 Jul 1999 02:39:59
Message: <37956b3f@news.povray.org>
Jon A. Cruz <jon### [at] geocitiescom> wrote:
: Instead of that, you should take the red channel straight from one image and then
: the blue and green from the other image. Combine those to the final image. That
: should give you nicer results and should process a little faster to boot.

  So if you have a green tennis ball on grass, you get a black image? Not
a good idea.
  It works just fine with the method I use.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.