 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 21 Mar 1999 19:46:46 +0100, Kalle Anka <kal### [at] anka com> wrote:
>But I would love to see a anon. CVS for pov, with a std. tree and a
>superpatch tree.
So would I. But first I have to get a machine with 24/7 connectivity
and sufficient power to run a CVS server. Even so, the "standard" tree
will only be updated when official sources are released to the Internet.
That's the best you can hope for, anyway, since the POV-Team doesn't
even use any kind of version control.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
par### [at] my-dejanewscom (Ron Parker) wrote:
>That's the best you can hope for, anyway, since the POV-Team doesn't
>even use any kind of version control.
not on the main source. but the windows version certainly is (thanks to
perforce software).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Mika wrote:
>
> Why is it that every time a new version is released, some people get
> paranoid about if it will be freely distributable or not?
> Delay in availability doesn't mean it will not be available. They have
> to test their program. If they publish each version right after it's
> compiled, we would have a povray 3.1099999832h every week.
Just like Leveller back in its beta days...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
> > If they publish each version right after it's
> > compiled, we would have a povray 3.1099999832h every week.
>
> Just like Leveller back in its beta days...
That explains the groove in the internet between my house
and Taps's site.
--
Bob Crispen
cri### [at] hiwaaynet
What a day, what a day, for an auto-da-fe.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
