In article <368ea2e4.0@news.povray.org>, war### [at] cctutfi says...
> Daren Scot Wilson <dar### [at] pipelinecom> wrote:
> : What I don't know is which OSs *don't* support DLLs (by any name)?
> 
>   DOS.
>   (I know, I know, DOS is not an operating system...)

Well, what about the .OVL in the old DOS system ? Wasn't it like the dll 
in a way ? Seems kinda close to me.

Yann

Post a reply to this message

Yann Coupin <pov### [at] club-internetfr> wrote:
: Well, what about the .OVL in the old DOS system ? Wasn't it like the dll 
: in a way ? Seems kinda close to me.

  If a _program_ supports .OVL-files, that doesn't mean that DOS supports them.
  DOS supports .OVL-files if there is a DOS system call which you can use
to use .OVL-file. Is there any?

-- 
main(i){char*_="BdsyFBThhHFBThhHFRz]NFTITQF|DJIFHQhhF";while(i=
*_++)for(;i>1;printf("%s",i-70?i&1?"[]":" ":(i=0,"\n")),i/=2);} /*- Warp. -*/

Post a reply to this message