Does anyone know whether there will be a Unix version of 3.5 or 4.0?

-Mark Gordon (feeling a little orphaned)

Post a reply to this message

I thought UNIX was far beyond version 3.5 or 4  :~)

Jim

Mark Gordon wrote in message <368BC9A3.21D8828D@mailbag.com>...
>Does anyone know whether there will be a Unix version of 3.5 or 4.0?
>
>-Mark Gordon (feeling a little orphaned)
>
>

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 31 Dec 1998 11:21:39 -0000, "Mick Hazelgrove"
<mic### [at] virginnet> wrote:

>
>Once again THANKS Pov team - the only sad news is the probably loss of the
>iso patch - can we keep some of it, the non Dll part? I espeacially like
>using it to create mathmatical surfaces, normal and color patterns.
>
>Keep up the good work
>
>Mick
>
The function-based part of iso-surfaces will definitly be used.  Only
the DLL based part.
	Chris Young, POV-Team

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 30 Dec 1998 18:31:42 -0800, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:

>Reposted with permission from from C.G.R.R.
>
>FROM:   Chris Young, POV-Team Coordinator
>DATE:   December 30, 1998
>TO:     POV-Ray enthusiasts everywhere (feel free to repost this)
>        Happy New Year from the POV-Team.

Many thanks for reposting this here.  I tried to post it but something
glitched.  I was just about to do it over when I saw yours.
	cy

Post a reply to this message

Mike <Ama### [at] aolcom> wrote:
: He said that just the DLL part would have to be removed:

: "Also some of the features
: will be modified or eliminated.  For example cross-platform
: portability is a major design priority and the iso-surface patch makes
: use of DLLs that are not portable.  We will likely eliminate that part
: of the patch."

  I wonder if it's absolutely impossible to make the same code without
the dlls. What's so special with the dlls anyways?

-- 
main(i){char*_="BdsyFBThhHFBThhHFRz]NFTITQF|DJIFHQhhF";while(i=
*_++)for(;i>1;printf("%s",i-70?i&1?"[]":" ":(i=0,"\n")),i/=2);} /*- Warp. -*/

Post a reply to this message

Well, after seeing The Hive and The Reading Room...

(And thanks for doing the survey! :-)

--
Lance.


---
For the latest MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone

Post a reply to this message

Dlls are only supported by the Windows operating system... Dynamic Link
Libraries.  The function calls necessary to use a Dll simply don't exist in
other operating systems. (They have their own special ways of doing things)

--
Lance.


---
For the latest MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone

Post a reply to this message

Yey!!!

Not that I could ever make anything half decent with it but hey, it was fun
to try :)

--
Lance.


---
For the latest MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone

Post a reply to this message

Lance Birch <zon### [at] satcomnetau> wrote:
: Dlls are only supported by the Windows operating system... Dynamic Link
: Libraries.  The function calls necessary to use a Dll simply don't exist in
: other operating systems. (They have their own special ways of doing things)

  I said:

  I wonder if it's absolutely impossible to make the same code WITHOUT
the dlls.

-- 
main(i){char*_="BdsyFBThhHFBThhHFRz]NFTITQF|DJIFHQhhF";while(i=
*_++)for(;i>1;printf("%s",i-70?i&1?"[]":" ":(i=0,"\n")),i/=2);} /*- Warp. -*/

Post a reply to this message

It might take some re-writing, but it should be possible, because after all
you could just compile the Dlls functions into the main program and then
nstead of calling the Dll, you just call the function.  So yeah, guess so.

--
Lance.


---
For the latest MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone

Post a reply to this message