 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran wrote:
> In the Windows version, just move the cursor on the slider bar and you'll
> see the pixels crawling.
The unofficial MLPov provides an option (.ini option, afair) for
pixel-by-pixel display. It slows down renderding of fast scenes*,
but it is helpful for optimizing big scenes.
* : I guess that the image display is pretty unoptimised, but it isn't
meant to be fast anyway.
All in all, it would be nice to have an option to display pixels
every N pixels in official version, just like it used to be under
MS-DOS (even if it defaults to full line).
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3f87f4e6@news.povray.org> , Fabien Mosen
<fab### [at] skynet be> wrote:
> All in all, it would be nice to have an option to display pixels
> every N pixels in official version, just like it used to be under
> MS-DOS (even if it defaults to full line).
The preview display really is the responsibility of the platform specific
frontened, this is the way it currently is and it is also they way it should
be.
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's better NOT to be alone, because otherwise you would never stop watch
the screen!
Anyone experience defragmentation trance?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The unofficial MLPov provides an option (.ini option, afair) for
yes, in the windows version, you can put an option Lines=0 in the
[RenderWindow] section of pvengine.ini
but it's really a quick hack don't use it :-/
M
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Apache" <apa### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in
news:3f880275$1@news.povray.org:
> It's better NOT to be alone, because otherwise you would
> never stop watch the screen!
>
> Anyone experience defragmentation trance?
Yes, guilty
--
Marc Champagne
marcch.AT.videotron.DOT.ca
Montreal, Canada
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:15:36 +0200, "Apache"
<apa### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>It's better NOT to be alone, because otherwise you would never stop watch
>the screen!
>
>Anyone experience defragmentation trance?
You bet! I used to watch "the caterpillars crawling" when I had a 40MB
with Stacker and used sdefrag on it. Fun, really. Modern defragging is
sooooo boring!
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Popov <pet### [at] vipbg> wrote in
news:e1spovgltiuu03c0k7qf46eu6h8r41pl65@4ax.com:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:15:36 +0200, "Apache"
><apa### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>
>>It's better NOT to be alone, because otherwise you would
>>never stop watch the screen!
>>
>>Anyone experience defragmentation trance?
>
> You bet! I used to watch "the caterpillars crawling" when I
> had a 40MB with Stacker and used sdefrag on it. Fun,
> really. Modern defragging is sooooo boring!
Especially when 1 square now-a-days represents 40meg :)
--
Marc Champagne
marcch.AT.videotron.DOT.ca
Montreal, Canada
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
