|
 |
On 26/01/2024 17:01, Cousin Ricky wrote:
> Ilya Razmanov <ily### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>> I have a weird problems with some prisms. Please see the file attached,
>> it's tiny example. As you can see, both hexagonal prisms and their
>> translations are calculated using school math; moreover, when it comes
>> to irrational floats, the same values are used whenever possible via
>> declaring the variable, so it have no choice but match. Still, there is
>> a gap between objects in vertical direction.
>>
>> I'm out of ideas regarding the cause of it. Any inspiration?
>
> The geometry of the hexagons is off. Replacing all occurrences of 0.25 with
> revsqrtof3/2 will fix it.
>
>
Yes, som error in yours points.
Assuming that the first point of the prism is good : <-0.5,0.25>
We can easily calculate the radius of the center containing the hexagon
sqrt(-0.50*-0.50 + 0.25*0.25) = 0.559017 = r
Calculating all the points gives :
< 0.0000, 0.5590>
< 0.4841, 0.2795>
< 0.4841, -0.2795>
< 0.0000, -0.5590>
<-0.4841, -0.2795>
<-0.4841, 0.2795>
with :
x = r*sin(radians(a));
z = r*cos(radians(a));
'a' is the angle : 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300
Drawing these points near your prism give the attached image where the
different positions of the points are clearly visible.
Hope that help
--
Kurtz le pirate
Compagnie de la Banquise
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'prizm test 3.png' (3 KB)
Preview of image 'prizm test 3.png'
|
|
