"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in message
> In article <email@example.com> , "Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress>
> > Hmm. It seems to me that the letter (Chris' posting) was saying "our
> > benchmark file makes heavy use of noise because it's a good measurement
> > CPU performance," whereas you were saying "mediasky.pov makes heavy use
> > noise and is therefore a bad measurement of CPU performance."
> But that is not what I said. I said that "mediasky.pov" uses it
> *exclusively*, which says exactly nothing about the use of noise in the
> benchmark file. Everything else is something you are reading into what we
> say but that we do not say at all.
Reading into it is exactly what the intended audience will do. In my
opinion, you are presenting too much information at one time to that
audience. If you don't like how Slime interpreted it, imagine how less
technically astute users would interpret it.
Post a reply to this message