POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.documentation.inbuilt : BITMAP_TYPE and HF_TYPE documentation versus functionality. Server Time: 17 Feb 2019 22:11:10 GMT
  BITMAP_TYPE and HF_TYPE documentation versus functionality. (Message 11 to 11 of 11)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: BITMAP_TYPE and HF_TYPE documentation versus functionality.
Date: 7 Feb 2018 10:38:48
Message: <5a7ad738$1@news.povray.org>
On 02/06/2018 06:44 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 2/5/2018 6:44 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
>> On 02/04/2018 02:45 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> On 1/8/2018 6:22 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>>>
>>>> i'll follow up when i have more than a few moments ... which hasn't 
>>>> been very often lately
>>>
>>> http://wiki.povray.org/content?title=Special:RecentChanges&hidebots=0
>>>
>>> click in the "diff" link to see what's been changed
>>
>> For all but the height_field page - which already has the optional 
>> indicator brackets around HF_TYPE - we should add braces [] around 
>> BITMAP_TYPE to indicate those specifications are also optional.
> 
> done ...
> 

Thanks. Much better. There is still one BITMAP_TYPE at the top of the page:

http://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Patterned_Textures

without the braces. If you do a search from the top of the page for 
BITMAP_TYPE, it's the first found.

Bill P.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2008 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.