POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.bugreports : Sepia, BW, polarizing, diffraction grating, Sun filters etc should be on ca= Server Time: 18 Jan 2019 00:59:00 GMT
  Sepia, BW, polarizing, diffraction grating, Sun filters etc should be on ca= (Message 1 to 6 of 6)  
From: jmichae3
Subject: Sepia, BW, polarizing, diffraction grating, Sun filters etc should be on ca=
Date: 29 Apr 2017 23:25:01
Message: <web.5905204bce5421e3944c3db40@news.povray.org>
you know this is the thing with pro cams, they have filters. would be nice to
have a set to choose from and put together.


docs on Bokeh (not in index), exterior_texture, and maybe exterior are unclear
or missing.


Post a reply to this message

From: jmichae3
Subject: Re: Sepia, BW, polarizing, diffraction grating, Sun filters etc should be o=
Date: 29 Apr 2017 23:30:00
Message: <web.5905214d3094c51944c3db40@news.povray.org>
ior and ior interior cannot be selected in index.


Post a reply to this message

From: jmichae3
Subject: Re: Sepia, BW, polarizing, diffraction grating, Sun filters etc should be o=
Date: 30 Apr 2017 01:05:01
Message: <web.590537be425991ec944c3db40@news.povray.org>
pattern,media,include subtrees are not accessible.


Post a reply to this message

From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: Sepia, BW, polarizing, diffraction grating, Sun filters etc should be o=
Date: 30 Apr 2017 13:05:20
Message: <5905e110$1@news.povray.org>
On 04/29/2017 09:02 PM, jmichae3 wrote:
> pattern,media,include subtrees are not accessible.
>
>
>
(also replying to two earlier posts in this thread)

Built in image filters could be handy and there's been macro and patch 
work toward this end over the years, but nothing yet pre-packaged.

As for the missing documentation index entries/subtrees, I know there 
was significant work to clean up index entries for the 3.7.1 release. In 
both the current http://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Keywords index 
and the html in the 3.7.1 docs directory I see valid entries, 
links/subtrees for bokeh, ior, interior, pattern, media and "include 
files."

If you are running 3.7.0 or a 3.7.1 version prior to say the end of 
2016, you might be seeing broken index issues already fixed. Otherwise, 
not sure. I am running Ubuntu linux not windows.

With respect to "exterior_texture" there has never been such a keyword 
to my knowledge. Rather just "texture" for the outside or exterior of 
objects. For the inside or interior there is the "interior_texture" 
feature.

Bill P.


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: Sepia, BW, polarizing, diffraction grating, Sun filters etcshould be o=
Date: 30 Apr 2017 20:16:50
Message: <59064632$1@news.povray.org>
On 4/30/2017 9:05 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
> As for the missing documentation index entries/subtrees, I know there 
> was significant work to clean up index entries for the 3.7.1 release. In 
> both the current http://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Keywords index 
> and the html in the 3.7.1 docs directory I see valid entries, 
> links/subtrees for bokeh, ior, interior, pattern, media and "include 
> files."

concur with your findings with one exception ... i /did/ find that there 
was indeed no bokeh entry so i added the appropriate indexentry tag in 
the markup. windows version isn't my primary either but everywhere i 
clicked i landed in the correct place.

> If you are running 3.7.0 or a 3.7.1 version prior to say the end of 
> 2016, you might be seeing broken index issues already fixed.

yes the user /must/ be using outdated as christoph put considerable 
effort towards this and i think he's called that issue fixed for a bit now


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: Sepia, BW, polarizing, diffraction grating, Sun filters etcshouldbe o=
Date: 2 May 2017 13:49:02
Message: <59088e4e$1@news.povray.org>
Am 30.04.2017 um 22:16 schrieb Jim Holsenback:

>> If you are running 3.7.0 or a 3.7.1 version prior to say the end of
>> 2016, you might be seeing broken index issues already fixed.
> 
> yes the user /must/ be using outdated as christoph put considerable
> effort towards this and i think he's called that issue fixed for a bit now

I did put some work into it, but to little avail. In the end it was your
re-organizing of the docs that turned out to solve the bulk of the index
issues :)


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2008 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.